Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a significant trend”

9,775 sentences · 9,775 papers · 47,878 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendp < 0.010.2× alphagold
Utilizing a slope model of individual regression lines for each subject to determine the consistent change in indexed stroke volume over the course of exposure, there was a significant trend of an increase in stroke volume over time ( p < 0.01) Supplementary Fig. 4 .
a significant trendp < 0.010.2× alphagold
The sensitivity analysis results revealed a significant trend across UACR tertiles and ACM among participants aged <80 and with no CVD history, respectively ( p < 0.01 for trend). 3.3 ROC analysis of UACR predictive value for ACM in DM The ROC analysis results demonstrated the UACR prognostic value for ACM.
a significant trendp = 0.0110.2× alphagold
Sensitivity Analyses (1) In patients with complete SUA data, we also found a reduced risk of AMI associated with lower SUA levels among allopurinol current users (AOR <6 mg/dL = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.53–0.91; AOR 6–7 mg/dL = 0.88; 95%CI:0.63–1.24; AOR >7 mg/dL = 1.03; 95%CI:0.76–1.40) showing a significant trend ( p = 0.011) ( Table 3 ); (2) the exclusion of hypertension from the adjusted model had no impact in the AOR estimates. 4.
a significant trendP = 0.0110.2× alphagold
Survival On survival analysis, there was a significant trend of the worst OS of advanced-stage patients based on FIGO 2009 ( P = 0.011 ) ( Figure 2A ) and FIGO 2018 staging ( P = 0.02 ) ( Figure 2B ), respectively.
a significant trendp = 0.0110.2× alphagold
To determine whether PEMT expression decreased with increasing severity of hepatic fibrosis, we examined RNA-sequencing-derived expression data among different fibrosis stages, and observed a significant trend in decreasing PEMT levels with cirrhosis < incomplete cirrhosis < bridging fibrosis (β = −1.185; p = 0.011).
a significant trendp = 0.0110.2× alphagold
A significant trend was observed in the subscale Enjoyment of Food and Emotional Overeating in children with obesity ( p = 0.011 and p = 0.008), abdominal obesity ( p = 0.031 and p = 0.017), and cardiometabolic risk ( p = 0.036 and p = 0.049) in the non-EBF group, compared to those who were EBF up to 6 months of age.