Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a significant trend”

9,775 sentences · 9,775 papers · 47,878 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendp < .0010.0× alphagold
A follow-up test with simple effects analysis revealed that the static trial was accompanied by a significant predominance of the average rating for the ownership illusion statements over that of the ownership control statements for the three shadows, Hand + : F (1,120) = 52.65, p < .001; Handshape−: F (1,120) = 21.41, p < .001; Rectangle + : F (1,120) = 4.88, p < .03; Rectangle − : F (1,120) =2.83, p = .10, n.s., whereas such a significant trend was only shown in the active shadows in the active trial, Hand+: F (1,120) = 104.05, p < .001; Handshape−: F (1,120) = 0.62, p = .43, n.s.; Rectangle+: F (1,120) = 35.93, p < .001; Rectangle−: F (1,120) = 0.04, p = .84, n.s.
Innocent Body-Shadow Mimics Physical Body.
Iperception · 2017 · PMC5418913
a significant trendp = 0.0010.0× alphagold
In the adjusted model, each SD-increase in AHEI (7.8 points; 7% of score range) conferred 15% lower probability of insomnia symptoms at follow-up (RR [95% confidence interval CI]: 0.85 [0.77, 0.93]), those in Q5 of AHEI had 0.54 times the probability as those in Q1 (95% CI: 0.39, 0.75), and there was a significant trend across quintiles (trend p = 0.001).
a significant trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Further, the number of sickle-shaped blood vessels was associated with distant metastasis and OS, with a significant trend toward a poor prognosis (metastasis P < 0.001, Cox; OS P < 0.001, Cox) observed for patients with more than 100 such vessels in large maximal tumor sections.
a significant trendp = 0.0010.0× alphagold
Upon comparing flap sizes and lengths of partial distal necrotic and uneventfully healed flaps a significant trend in flap size (261 ± 33.8 cm 2 vs 186 ± 61.7 cm 2 ; 95% CI: −103.5 to – 59.8: p = 0.001) and flap length (29 ± 5.1 cm vs 24 ± 3.8 cm, 95% CI: −9.3 to −3.4; p = 0.003) was seen.
a significant trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
For WC-defined phenotypes, both obesity and metabolic dysfunction independently contributed to increased CVD risk relative to MHN: MHO (RR 1.84, 95% CI: 1.23–2.77), MUN (RR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.14–2.20), and MUO (RR 2.22, 95% CI: 1.63–3.04), with a significant trend across categories ( P < 0.001).
a significant trendP < .0010.0× alphagold
Interrupted time-series analysis did not detect an immediate shift in Medi-Cal or uninsured visits at the quarter of unwinding, but indicated a significant trend change, showing a decline of 0.37 pp per quarter ( P < .001) in Medi-Cal visits and an increase of 0.16 pp per quarter ( P < .001) in uninsured visits relative to the pre-unwinding period ( Table 1 , Figure 1 ).