Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a significant trend”

9,775 sentences · 9,775 papers · 47,878 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

26 Hilty found clinical improvement for depression in both groups that received either telephone-based intensive disease management modules (IDMM) and televideo-based psychiatric consultation versus telephone-based disease management (DMM) alone with a significant trend favoring the IDMM group. 27 Medication Adherence In three papers, medication adherence was a reported outcome.
When looking at Table 4 , however, some exceptions can be noticed: breast and prostate cancer showed no trend, consistent with the fact that they did not turn out to be associated to CRC as FPC; thyroid cancer also lacks a significant trend, likely due to the small number of cases included in the study; endometrial cancer was the only cancer type which showed to be at an increased risk with a constant trend in time.
Slattery et al (2013) examined the dietary oxidative balance and observed a significant trend toward reduced breast cancer risk with a higher dietary oxidative balance. 18 Xu et al (2025) analyzed US cancer survivors and found that a higher OBS strongly predicted lower all-cause and cancer-specific mortality, 19 suggesting that even after diagnosis, better oxidative balance confers a survival advantage.
DDT showed a significant trend for NHL risk with life-time days of use RR = 1.0 (ref), 1.3 (0.9–1.8), 1.1 (0.7–1.7), 1.7 (1.1–2.6); p trend = 0.02, while the intensity weighted lifetime days of use of DDT was of borderline significance: RR = 1.0 (ref), 1.2 (0.8–1.8), 1.1 (0.8–1.7), 1.6 (1.0–2.3); p trend = 0.06.
According to the logistic regression analysis, in unadjusted model, compared with participants without any elevated liver enzymes, the OR of diabetes was 1.47 (95% CI: 1.32–1.65) for participants with one elevated liver enzymes, 1.60 (95% CI: 1.36–1.89) for participants with two elevated liver enzymes, and 2.17 (95% CI: 1.69–2.79) for participants with three or four elevated liver enzymes, with a significant trend in OR with increasing number of elevated liver enzymes.