Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a positive trend”

11,006 sentences · 11,006 papers · 20,836 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a positive trendp < 0.12.0× alphagold
For Zambia, no child development or parenting outcomes were statistically significant; however, a positive trend ( p < 0.1) was detected for telling the child stories (β = 0.65, 95% CI: −0.03–1.32, p = 0.06) and talking to the child during meals (β = 0.65, 95% CI: −0.07–1.37, p = 0.08).
a positive trendp < 0.102.0× alphagold
Model B3 combined both sets of predictors and explained the most variance overall (McFadden R 2 = 0.273); PLF Awareness retained a positive point estimate ( OR = 3.85, p < 0.05 under standard SE; p _robust = 0.153 under HC3) and being male showed a positive trend ( OR = 8.03, p < 0.10 under standard SE; p _robust = 0.303 under HC3) that did not survive HC3 adjustment.
a positive trendP = .102.0× alphagold
Stratification by sex identified no significant differential changes in medial RUNX2, although males demonstrated a negative trend and females a positive trend after denervation (male: 0.13% ± 0.1% [denervated] vs 1.1% ± 0.7% [sham]; P = .10; female: 0.85% ± 0.3% [denervated] vs 0.23% ± 0.09% [sham]; P = .10) ( Fig 3 , G ).
a positive trendP = 0.12.0× alphagold
Spearman’s rank correlations were positive between cows’ milk retinol and mothers’ blood retinol, where R = 0.43 ( n = 20, P = 0.05), between mothers’ blood retinol and mother’s milk retinol, where R = 0.24 ( n = 38, P = 0.01), between mothers’ milk retinol and infant blood retinol, where R = 0.49 ( n = 38, P = 0.001), and a positive trend between cows’ milk and mothers’ milk, where R = 0.48 ( n = 11, P = 0.1).
a positive trendp = 0.1022.0× alphagold
A tendency toward a positive trend in adherence rates was identified in the period 2019–2021 among subjects with humerus or wrist (Supplementary Fig. 3 , panel b, test for trend p = 0.102) and vertebra (panel c, test for trend p = 0.602) index FFs, while the trend remained even more blunted among subjects with hip index FFs (panel d, test for trend p = 0.107).