Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a positive trend”

11,006 sentences · 11,006 papers · 20,836 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a positive trendp = .061.2× alphagold
The improvements included a sharp increase in servings of fruit consumed (67.4%, p < .01) and a positive trend for improvements in energy levels (11.1%, p = .06) and quality of sleep (13.4%, p = .07), however, those changes and changes in steps and servings of vegetables from week 1 until week 8 were not statistically significant.
a negative trendP = 0.061.2× alphagold
a positive trendP = 0.081.6× alphagold
Infant hypertonicity also showed a negative trend in its association with HSD11B2 methylation (ρ = −0.11, P = 0.06), while infant attention showed a positive trend in its association with HSD11B2 methylation, with increasing methylation related to increasing infant attention scores (ρ = 0.14, P = 0.08).
borderline significantp=0.061.2× alphagold
a positive trendp=0.142.8× alphagold
A positive trend for HF (coefficient=0.018, p=0.14) corresponded to a 1.9% increased relative risk per percentage point increase in PVC burden, explaining 9.1% of heterogeneity, whereas a borderline significant relationship for stroke (coefficient=0.03, p=0.06) indicated an approximate 3.1% increase, with PVC burden accounting for 100% of the variance.
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
From the longer time series (2009–2015) available from seven data loggers, five showed a positive trend in minimum soil temperature (1‐ALZ west, 3‐SIN south, 4‐ISA east, 4‐ISA south, 4‐ISA west, with R 2 = 0.6, 0.2, 0.3, 0.2, 0.5, respectively), whereby 1‐ALZ west was marginally significant ( p = 0.06), and four showed a positive trend in mean temperature (1‐ALZ south, 3‐SIN west, 3‐SIN south, 4‐ISA west, with R 2 > 0.2).
a positive trendp = .061.2× alphagold
However, the pattern of results was the same as in the previous analysis, with only electrode P3 showing a positive trend instead of a significant difference [t(13) = 2.05, p = .06].
Top-down control in contour grouping.
PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3542329
a positive trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
DST-Forward Regarding short-term memory span (DST-forward), conventional meta-analysis showed a positive trend for partially immersive VR (Group B) over active controls (Group C) (n = 55; SMD = 0.87, 95% CI [−0.03, 1.78], p = 0.06; I 2 = 60%), while fully immersive VR (Group A) did not significantly differ from passive controls (n = 370; SMD = 0.13, 95% CI [−0.07, 0.34], p = 0.20; I 2 = 0%) ( Figure S9 ).