Safety analysis did not report any significant rise in serious adverse event risk, hypoglycemia, or decompressive craniectomy risk, although a numerical trend for more hypoglycemia was observed in the glibenclamide group.
← all phrases
“a numerical trend”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
DRSS improvement Rates of at least 2-step DRSS improvement were largely consistent across treatment arms and between the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup and the pooled YOSEMITE/RHINE cohort at weeks 52 and 96, although there was a numerical trend for higher proportions in the faricimab arms versus the aflibercept arm in the YOSEMITE Japan subgroup (Fig. 5 ).
Although the overall LA interpretation rate of o1-mini did not reach 60%, it was close—reaching 58.49%—and still showed a numerical trend toward LA preference.
Gemini 2.5 Flash showed a numerical trend toward slightly higher overall performance, with higher mean scores for accuracy and completeness (accuracy: 4.60 ± 0.56; completeness: 4.70 ± 0.47).
3 A) and a numerical trend for increasing STEMIs toward reopening.
LB2: 92.5%), (3) LB ablation showed an acceptable safety profile, with an overall complication rate of 8.9% and a numerical trend to lower complication rates with LB2 (LB1: 10.1% vs.
(2020) observed a numerical trend towards reduced reaction times (RTs) following losses compared to wins, suggesting a stronger urgency to act after losses.
There was a numerical trend towards earlier diagnosis over time, with stage IIIA NSCLC diagnosed in 33.2% of the 2000–2002 cohort, versus 46.5% of the 2012–2013 cohort.
There is a numerical trend in favor of lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster, which is more pronounced in the population with PHN than pDPN.
Although this difference did not reach statistical significance, a numerical trend toward improved outcomes in PNH-positive patients was observed.
No differences emerged in glucose levels or prevalence of diabetes, although a numerical trend toward lower HbA1c was observed in the NFAI group.
Although we could find no significant difference in vascular complications between normal and small size femoral arteries, there was a numerical trend towards more complications in patients with small femoral arteries, and it seems plausible that such an association exists.
At all three intervals, there seems to be a numerical trend towards a higher risk of PVE from mechanical to biological SAVR to TAVI.
The incidence showed a numerical trend toward fewer events in the Low LDL-C group, with 4 events (6.7%), compared to 8 events (13.3%) in the Non-Low LDL-C group ( Table 4 ).
Formal subgroup analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between monotherapy and combination therapy for MNSIE, MNSIQ, or sural nerve NCV (interaction p > 0.05) but demonstrated one for peroneal nerve NCV (interaction p = 0.039), although a numerical trend towards greater benefit with combination regimens was observed.
Final overall survival (OS) results from LOTUS showed a numerical trend favoring ipatasertib-containing therapy in both the intent-to-treat (ITT) and the biomarker-selected populations, with median OS exceeding 2 years ( 11 ).
Although dyslexic readers showed a numerical trend to support a benefit of TL previews compared to SL previews, simple effects analyses indicated that the benefit of TL previews compared to SL previews did not reach significance for dyslexic readers, where the TL effect was larger for skilled adult readers (see Table 5 ).
Our findings were: (1) There was no statistical significance between LM, LAD, LCX, or RCA involvement in patients with STEMI and SARS-CoV-2 versus without SARS-CoV-2; (2) There was a numerical trend toward LAD disease involvement in patients with STEMI and SARS-CoV-2 versus without SARS-CoV-2 (49.6% vs 44.9%); (3) Higher in-hospital mortality of statistical significance was observed in patients with STEMI and SARS-CoV-2 versus without SARS-CoV-2 (22.1% vs 5.8%, OR 5.24; 95% Confidence Interval 3.63, 7.56).
While certain complications (VTE, subclavian hematoma) showed a numerical trend toward higher incidence in females, none reached statistical significance, likely due to limited sample size.
AS alone resulted in weight loss comparable to sham and TBI alone, whereas the combination of TBI + AS showed a numerical trend toward nearly doubled weight loss compared with single AS or TBI exposure; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 4 A).
A numerical trend toward lower TPSS in the AFL + ETA group may indicate clinical benefit and justifies follow-up investigation within the framework of larger clinical trials.
Other comorbidities and symptoms, including osteoporosis, arthritis, autoimmune diseases, cardiac arrest, gout, bone pain, and swelling, were not significantly linked to FP scores, although some (e.g., cardiac arrest, β = − 16.33; p = 0.118) showed a numerical trend toward worse perceptions.
Although the difference in the risk scores between responders and non-responders in the Zhao GBM anti-PD1 cohort was not statistically significant, there was indeed a numerical trend showing higher scores in non-responders compared to responders ( Fig. 5 F).
At 3 mm, a numerical trend toward higher values was observed in the SIM group (113.93 ± 85.81 vs. 46.47 ± 139.40), although this did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.0825).
While the difference did not reach statistical significance, the DSP group showed a numerical trend toward shorter procedure times.