Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a nonsignificant trend”

5,407 sentences · 5,407 papers · 7,516 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a nonsignificant trendP =.153.0× alphagold
Results Adolescents who attended education sessions had significant and clinically relevant improvements in asthma control (ACQ score difference: −0.6; P =.03) and exhibited a nonsignificant trend of improvement in asthma-related quality of life (Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score difference: −0.45; P =.15) when compared to those who did not adhere to education.
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.153.0× alphagold
Beta-blockers showed a nonsignificant trend toward benefit (HR: 1.7, p = 0.15), while RAAS inhibitors and MRA had no significant impact. 4 Discussion The study assessed the recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) of non-ischemic aetiology.
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.153.0× alphagold
However, the prognostic effect was only significant in the validation set ( P = 0.015; it showed a nonsignificant trend in the training set of ABC-DLBCL, P = 0.15), and the number of cases with long K/LCDR3 length was small (4 and 3 in the training and validation sets, respectively).
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.153.0× alphagold
Overall survival There was a nonsignificant trend toward improved OS in the tivantinib group (19.8 months; 95% CI, 13.4–27.0) compared with the placebo group (16.9 months; 95% CI, 12.2–20.4; HR, 0.70; P = 0.15) (Fig. 2 b ).
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.1523.0× alphagold
A nonsignificant trend for lesser use of mechanical ventilation (26.5% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.152) and vasopressor support (20.5% vs. 15.9%, P = 0.304) was observed during the second wave but mortality at 60 days from admission (24.5%) was in the range of what was previously reported, 31 , 32 with no significant difference between the first and second wave ( Figure 4 a; Log rank test, P = 0.48).
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.15633.1× alphagold
In the case of the light chain, there was a nonsignificant trend over time where LV1 and LV7 usage increased and decreased over time, respectively (Supplementary figure 4g ) (LV1: P = 0.1563, LV7: P = 0.250), whereas LV2 and LV3 showed a significant increase and decrease, respectively, in their gene usage overtime (LV2: P = 0.0313, LV3: P = 0.0156).