Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a nonsignificant trend”

5,407 sentences · 5,407 papers · 7,516 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a nonsignificant trendp = 0.142.8× alphagold
Participants in the LPD group displayed similar profiles to those observed in the CKD mice model, including significant reductions in BW (~−1.4 kg) and BMI (~−0.5 kg/m 2 ; Table 2 ) with a nonsignificant trend toward lower caloric intake despite nutritional support (20.7 ± 1.5 vs 23.8 ± 1.4 kcal/kg/d; p = 0.14).( Figure 2c ) At T0, glucose homeostasis was similar between groups; however, LPD feeding improved glucose tolerance without modification of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR) or β -cell function (HOMA- β ), as compared to the ND group ( Figure 2d–e , Table 2 ).
a nonsignificant trendp = .142.8× alphagold
The only comparison that survived multiple comparison correction (BH critical value = 0.03) was a significant interaction between gender and CS–IFG phase locking in the beta band (β = 417.99, SE = 189.28, t (55 = 2.21, p = .03, LLCI = 38.65, ULCI = 797.33); simple slope analyses indicated that women tended to perform worse as their CS–IFG phase locking increased in response to STEMIs (β = −6.89, SE = 4.08, t (55) = −1.69, p = .097, LLCI = −401.06, ULCI = 34.18), whereas men showed a nonsignificant trend in the opposite direction (β = 8.81, SE = 5.82, t (55) = 1.51, p = .14, LLCI = −76.15, ULCI = 545.26).
a nonsignificant trendP < 0.153.0× alphagold
Left ventricular ejection fraction Echocardiographic analysis indicated a nonsignificant trend toward improved LVEF in the BAT group and a slight reduction in the control group, with a between‐group difference of 2.5 ± 1.7% ( P < 0.15). 24 The BeAT‐HF study did not report this endpoint 26 and so a meta‐analysis was not possible.
a nonsignificant trendp = 0.153.0× alphagold
The relationship between IgG hypogalactosylation and disease activity was significantly different between strata defined by SE (CRP, p = 0.0003, p Bonferroni = 0.0036) and RF (CRP, p < 0.0001, p Bonferroni < 0.0012), whereas ACPA strata revealed only a nonsignificant trend ( p = 0.15).
a nonsignificant trendP = 0.153.0× alphagold
Overall survival There was a nonsignificant trend toward improved OS in the tivantinib group (19.8 months; 95% CI, 13.4–27.0) compared with the placebo group (16.9 months; 95% CI, 12.2–20.4; HR, 0.70; P = 0.15) (Fig. 2 b ).