Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a negative trend”

4,202 sentences · 4,202 papers · 9,832 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a negative trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
The effect of number of repetitions differed between the series, with a negative trend in the first series and a neutral slope in the second and third series (main effect for repetition number: OR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.96, 0.99], p < 0.001; interaction between second series and repetition number: OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.00, 1.04], p = 0.018; interaction between third series and repetition number: OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.00, 1.04], p = 0.044).
a negative trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Temporal analysis of genome size (2000–2025) revealed an overall positive correlation (ρ = 0.17, p < 0.001, n = 1,067), with complete genomes showing stronger correlation (ρ = 0.223, p < 0.001, n = 45) while contig-level assemblies exhibited a negative trend (ρ = −0.214, p < 0.001, n = 776), likely reflecting assembly fragmentation artifacts.
a negative trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Mean VAI in women with prior GDM was significantly higher than the non-GDM group (19.7, 95%CI: 6.24, 33.15, P = 0.004), although both groups overtime experienced a negative trend (− 10.9, 95%CI: -13.1, − 2.1, P < 0.001); the GDM group showed a higher decrease in VAI (mean changes: -6.62; 95% CI, − 11,-2.1; P interaction = 0.001).
a negative trendp = 0.0020.0× alphagold
a positive trendp = 0.0100.2× alphagold
Long‐term changes in growth rates at the population level When examining the long‐term changes in growth rates per site, the Columbretes Islands presented a negative trend in linear extension ( r 2 = 0.717, p = 0.002) and calcification ( r 2 = 0.595, p = 0.009) between 2003 and 2012, and a positive trend in density ( r 2 = 0.635, p = 0.010) and calcification ( r 2 = 0.536, p = 0.025) between 2013 and 2021.
a negative trendp = 0.00230.0× alphagold
Western blot analysis confirmed that ABHD6 protein levels were consistent across all samples, whereas gel‐based ABPP analysis revealed that ABHD6 activity was significantly lower in resilient individuals, with a negative trend in AD donors (Figure 4G‐I , Figure S4 : resilient vs control, p = 0.0023; AD vs control, p = 0.068, AD vs resilient, p = 0.089).
a negative trendP = 0.00270.1× alphagold
For subclonal mutations, all our observations remained significant (anti-EGFR, β = 9.86, P = 6.23 × 10 −05 ; DNA repair, β = 11.41, P = 2.94 × 10 −06 ; length of time on cytotoxic agents, β = 0.28, P = 0.0027), and there was a negative trend for the time between samples ( β = −0.15, P = 0.0027).
highly significantp = 0.00320.1× alphaqualifiedgold
In line with this, a correlation analysis between NO and AsPgb expression revealed a negative trend across the full time course ( r = −0.32); however, this became stronger at intermediate stress stages ( r = −0.40) and became highly significant at 40%–45% sRWC ( r = −0.98, p = 0.0032).