Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a negative trend”

4,202 sentences · 4,202 papers · 9,832 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a negative trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Compared with the model that included all hospitals, the sensitivity analysis demonstrated a lower baseline proportion ( β 0 ) (48.5%, 95% CI 47.2–49.8; p < 0.001), a higher baseline trend ( β 1 ) (0.5%, 95% CI 0.4–0.5; p < 0.001), a higher level of change post-QMHAC restrictions ( β 2 ) (11%, 95% CI 9.1–12.8; p < 0.001), a negative trend after QHMAC restcitions ( β 3 ) (− 0.2%, 95% CI − 0.3 to − 0.1; p < 0.001), a reduced level of change post-PBS restrictions ( β 4 ) (3.7%, 95% CI 1.8–5.5; p < 0.001), and a similar trend after PBS restrictions ( β 5 ) (− 0.2%, 95% CI − 0.3 to − 0.1; p < 0.001).
a negative trendP < .0010.0× alphagold
Overall, the JSD distance of Donor A x to the outcome community showed a negative trend over time (e.g. negative slopes), representing a progressive increase in the contribution of this donor community over the sampling period ( P < .001), except for A −5 with no correlation between JSD distance of Donor A −5 —outcome community and time ( P > .05).
a negative trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
The observed trends were: (A) a negative trend with Restinga cover ( β = −0.260, p < 0.001); (B) a positive trend with urban land cover ( β = 0.010, p < 0.001); (C) an inverse trend with patch fragmentation ( β = −4.995, p < 0.001); and (D) a positive trend with patch isolation ( β = 0.001, p < 0.001).
Viral Diversity of Coastal Restinga Soils From Southern Brazil.
Environ Microbiol Rep · 2026 · PMC13078860
a negative trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
The effect of number of repetitions differed between the series, with a negative trend in the first series and a neutral slope in the second and third series (main effect for repetition number: OR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.96, 0.99], p < 0.001; interaction between second series and repetition number: OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.00, 1.04], p = 0.018; interaction between third series and repetition number: OR = 1.02, 95% CI [1.00, 1.04], p = 0.044).
a negative trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Mean VAI in women with prior GDM was significantly higher than the non-GDM group (19.7, 95%CI: 6.24, 33.15, P = 0.004), although both groups overtime experienced a negative trend (− 10.9, 95%CI: -13.1, − 2.1, P < 0.001); the GDM group showed a higher decrease in VAI (mean changes: -6.62; 95% CI, − 11,-2.1; P interaction = 0.001).