Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a negative trend”

4,202 sentences · 4,202 papers · 9,832 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a negative trendP = 0.142.8× alphagold
Native mean T1 values presented a significant and positive correlation with interstitial histological fibrosis fraction (r = 0.71, P = 0.03) but not with total histological fibrosis (r = 0.28, P = 0.46) and a negative trend of correlation with fatty fibrosis (r = -0.53, P = 0.14) and fat histological fraction (r = -0.60, P = 0.09) ( Fig 3E and 3H ).
a negative trendp = .1523.0× alphagold
prevention of torture forensic psychiatry seclusion restraint schizophrenia Overall, a negative trend is apparent in percentage of patients in seclusion (F(1,7) = 2.58, p = .152, R 2 = .27, using y = −1.09x + 24.29) and restraint (F(1,7) = 7.31, p = .030, R 2 = .51, using y = −0.63x + 10.76), while the trend only reached significance in restraint.
a negative trendp = 0.163.2× alphagold
a positive trendp = 0.265.2× alphagold
For example, although nonsignificant, the link between sentiment dominance and depression scores had a negative trend on Day 2, r 2 = 0.08, F (1, 13) = 2.17, β = −0.02, p = 0.16, 95% CI [−0.04, 0.008], but had a positive trend on Day 30, r 2 = 0.03, F (1, 12) = 1.38, β = 0.01, p = 0.26, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.03] ( Figure 3(b) and (c)), showing that patterns were inconsistent with bi-weekly sampling and small sample size.
a negative trendp = 0.163.2× alphagold
Relation between measured OzVal-Hb adduct level and hematologic variables In dose group B, a negative trend was observed between OzVal-Hb adduct measured after the first dose and relative decrease of WBC (Rs = −0.66, p = 0.16, n = 6) and neutrophils (Rs = −0.46, p = 0.35, n = 6) measured day 8 after treatments and Hb levels after dose cycle three versus baseline values (Rs = −0.83, p = 0.04, n = 6).
a negative trendp-value = 0.163.2× alphagold
Additional analysis done separately for individual positive trait scores showed a significant negative correlation for agreeableness score (r = −0.36, p-value = 0.03) ( Fig S3a ) and a negative trend for openness (r = −0.24, p-value = 0.16), extraversion (r = −0.15, p-value = 0.37) and conscientiousness (r = −0.26, p-value = 0.12).