a negative trendp = 0.16
While a negative trend towards smaller home ranges under supplementary feeding was observed, our dataset provided weak evidence ( p = 0.16) against the null hypothesis of no effect.
While a negative trend towards smaller home ranges under supplementary feeding was observed, our dataset provided weak evidence ( p = 0.16) against the null hypothesis of no effect.
In our meta-analysis, only isopleth 90 of the kernel, representing the innermost part of the home range of all estimators considered, showed a trend similar in strength and direction to the overall effect of supplementary feeding on home range size.
The marginal tendency of home range size decrease was identified for carnivores and rodents, while a weak trend of home range increase was observed in ungulates.
While home ranges based on capture-mark-recapture data showed no response to supplementary feeding, telemetry-based home ranges showed a decreasing trend in response to feeding.