Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a negative trend”

4,202 sentences · 4,202 papers · 9,832 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a negative trendp = 0.0601.2× alphagold
The analysis of the effects of personality traits revealed that neuroticism had a significant positive effect in the WM training tasks, r = 0.39, p = 0.048, and a negative trend effect, r = −0.35, p = 0.060, on the improvement in the n -back transfer task, while there was no significant effect, r = −0.01, p = 0.974, in the word list task.
a negative trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Moderating effects of intervention duration, age and gender Meta-regression analyses revealed a negative trend between intervention duration and effect sizes for teacher-rated disruptive behavior ( b(SE) = 0.006(0.003), p = 0.06, R 2 = .22), suggesting larger effects for behavioral programs with a shorter duration.
a negative trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In girls, placental EtP exposure was significantly inversely associated with head circumference ( p = 0.01) and showed a negative trend for birthweight ( p = 0.06) and birth length ( p = 0.08), whereas placental sum of paraben exposure was significantly and inversely associated both with head circumference ( p = 0.008) and with birth weight ( p = 0.04) and showed a negative trend for birth length ( p = 0.08).
a negative trendP = 0.061.2× alphagold
a positive trendP = 0.081.6× alphagold
Infant hypertonicity also showed a negative trend in its association with HSD11B2 methylation (ρ = −0.11, P = 0.06), while infant attention showed a positive trend in its association with HSD11B2 methylation, with increasing methylation related to increasing infant attention scores (ρ = 0.14, P = 0.08).
a negative trendp = 0.0601.2× alphagold
When stratified for diagnostic groups, a moderate positive correlation was observed in PDD/DLB ( ρ = 0.56, p < 0.05), while no significant correlation was observed in OND ( ρ = –0.10, p = 2.448), and a negative trend was observed in FTD ( ρ = –0.40, p = 0.060) and MCI-AD ( ρ = –0.31, p = 0.128) without reaching significance ( Fig. 4D ).
a negative trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
For the ST fast pace, the multiple linear regression model for gait speed was significant ( p = 0.02, Table 2 ), with a variance resolution of R 2 adj = 22%, driven by the MDS-UPDRS III (β = −0.27, p = 0.04) with a moderately negative post-hoc correlation (ρ = −0.31, p = 0.02, Figure 3A ) and a negative trend for use of a walking aid (β = −0.27, p = 0.06) with a moderate negative post-hoc correlation (ρ = −0.36, p = 0.004, Figure 3A ).