Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a marginal trend”

627 sentences · 627 papers · 966 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

We demonstrated that there was a marginal trend of association between the MS or FS slope between the eyes with and without macular complications, but this association was not statistically significant. 10 Taking into consideration the effects of PSC, macular complications as potential confounding factors, although there were no CME patients in this study because of the exclusion criteria, we assessed the association between aqueous flare values and the progression of visual field loss ( Table 3 ).
Adverse Effects of Particular Interest In the FOURIER trial, as discussed below, there was a marginal trend of some adverse effects of particular interest to occur more frequently in the evolocumab group than placebo including muscle-related events, incidence of diabetes, and neurocognitive events as discussed below [ 4 ].
Effects of Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Events.
Curr Cardiol Rev · 2017 · PMC5730965
Conversely, in the Breast Cancer International Research Group (BCIRG)-001 trial the combination of docetaxel (Taxotere®), doxorubicin (Adriamycin®) and cyclophosphamide (TAC) offered a significant improvement in 3-year DFS in patients with luminal B (defined as ER-positive, PgR-positive and either Ki67 high or HER-positive), but only a marginal trend in patients with TNBC or HER2-enriched tumors over treatment with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FAC).
Headspace from control samples showed only a marginal trend toward more positive δ 13 C‐CH 4 values (−47.3 ± 0.3‰ to −44.8 ± 1.1‰) during the incubation period while considerable change in δ 13 C‐CH 4 values (−47.3 ± 0.3‰ to +47.1 ± 11.9‰) was observed for N. tabacum incubated under light conditions (100 μmol m −2 s −1 ).
Yet, Spearman correlation analysis revealed that, in the AUT group, there was a positive correlation between STQ scores and FC strength during social touch observation ( ρ = 0.53, p FDR = 0.01) and a marginal trend of positive correlation during nonsocial touch ( ρ = 0.41, p FDR = 0.07).