“a marginal trend”

However, a considerable portion of the variance remained unexplained ( R 2 = 0.41), and 19% of participants (95CI: 10–28%) misreported their behaviour, t (74) = −4.12, p < 0.001, but participants' tendency to misreport safety voice acts over safety silence was only a marginal trend, OR = 2.78, Wald (1) = 2.48, p = 0.09 (bootstrap sample = 1,000).

As per previous investigations of visual performance fields [5] , [8] , we first conducted a 2 (Head Posture) * 2 (Distractor Orientation) * 8 (Target Location) omnibus ANOVA on these transformed values averaged over participants, which confirmed main effects of Head Posture ( F (1,3) = 13.474, MSE = .139, p = .035, η 2 = .818), and Location ( F (7,21) = 11.521, MSE = .427, p <.001, η 2 = .793), but only a marginal trend for the main effect of Distractor Orientation ( F (1,3) = 6.104, MSE = .841, p = .09, η 2 = .670).

AON AON analyses demonstrated a marginal trend for the effect of movement intensity, F (2, 58) = 2.42, p = 0.09.

There was further a marginal trend toward this effect from 1-day to 1-week posttesting ( z = −1.673, p = .09, OR = 0.796).

In the multivariate model included BED, it remained an independent predictor (aHR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04–1.09; p < 0.001), while lesion volume showed only a marginal trend (aHR = 1.21; 95% CI, 0.97–1.51; p = 0.091).

The interaction between cue type and relatedness showed a marginal trend towards significance, F (1, 60) = 2.95, p = .091, η p 2 = .05.

The model showed only a marginal trend for predicting spatial advantage, F(1, 74) = 2.93, p = .091, R 2 = .038, with an unstandardized coefficient (β) of −.075 (p = .091).

A marginal trend ( p = 0.091) was found for sleep talking and total sleep duration ( p = 0.086) with no difference in REM sleep duration ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

Our meta-analysis of high quality RCTs did not show any effect on percent fat or fat mass, though a marginal trend ( p = 0.092) for BMI to decrease with increasing vitamin D status was noted.

We found a significant, albeit weak, negative correlation between positive affect and happy judgments to female ( r = -0.370, p = 0.000) faces, with a marginal trend in the same direction for male faces ( r = -0.151, p = 0.093).

However, diabetes duration exhibited a marginal trend (β = 0.10, p = 0.093), indicating a possible association that warrants further investigation.

A marginal trend was observed for language development at 1 years CA ( p = 0.094), suggesting a possible association between higher MOM intake and reduced impact of composite pain scores, though these findings should be interpreted cautiously.

Although PAPP-A showed a marginal trend toward increased risk of PPROM (aOR = 1.826), this did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.095).

There was a marginal trend towards significance (LogFC = −0.68; P = 0.0960) for a lower NR1D1 gene expression in skeletal muscle after acute aerobic exercise (Fig. 3 M ).

Post-hoc analysis showed that LPP elicited by positive pictures was significantly more positive than LPP elicited both negative ( F (1, 21) = 8.19, p = .027, η p 2 = .281) and neutral ( F (1, 21) = 14.18, p = .003, η p 2 = .403) pictures when all locations were considered; LPP elicited by negative pictures compared to neutral ones was not significantly different, but only showed a marginal trend ( F (1, 21) = 5.273, p = .096, η p 2 = .201).

Statistical analyses (see Table 2 for details) revealed a main effect of Condition ( F (1, 61.4) = 10.81, p = 0.002) and a marginal trend for Language ( F (1, 126.0) = 2.81, p = 0.096).

This analysis can only detect large effects due to low power, but a one-tailed t -test revealed a marginal trend for higher NWR scores in the latter, t (11) = 1.38, p = 0.097; mean for those who do not read at all = 54.34%, mean for the others = 66.50%, Cohen’s d = 0.278.

On a marginal trend level, an interaction effect was seen for PS/BA ratio and the presence of HP dysfunction ( p = 0.097, F = 2.44).

No significant mediation by the right amygdala FA was found between fasting glucose and BMI z-scores score up to 60 months of age, although a marginal trend was observed at 54 months with β=0.47 (95% CI −0.09 to 1.03) (p=0.097) ( table 3 ).

However, its interaction with stimulus type showed a marginal trend, F (2, 296.26) = 2.34, p = 0.098).

Although the cumulative rescue analgesia count showed only a marginal trend ( P = 0.098), this may reflect insufficient statistical power due to the small sample size or variability in individual pain thresholds.

Regarding user engagement metrics, although the number of likes, comments, and daily average interactions did not show statistically significant differences, there was a marginal trend toward higher sharing behaviors for the higher-quality videos ( p = 0.099).

4 Discussion The results supported H1: the MV condition enhanced pleasure in both behavioral and EEG measures, with arousal showing a convergent pattern in EEG ( p < 0.05) and a marginal trend in behavioral data ( p = 0.099) across all three context–solution pairs.

Finally, for bradykinesia, we found a marginal trend‐level correlation ON medication: [ T (55) = −1.68, r 2 = .05, p = .099] and no effect OFF medication: [ T (52) = −1.131, r 2 = .02, p = .263].

Finally, abnormal ROM was significantly associated only with initial pain and showed a marginal trend toward the association with higher pain at discharge ( p < 0.1) ( Table 4 B). 3.5.