“a marginal trend toward significance”

Notably, while APO_B (p=0.138) and sex (p=0.132) showed no significant association, glucose levels (OR=2.1, p=0.066) exhibited a marginal trend toward significance, warranting further investigation.

A marginal trend toward significance was found between the age groups and S. stercoralis infection.

Interocular distance presents the most notable difference (t = 1.76, p = 0.089), but the p -value remains above 0.05, indicating only a marginal trend toward significance.

Neck circumference (OR = 0.57; p < 0.001) and daytime sleepiness (OR = 0.86; p = 0.01) were significantly associated with moderate/high OSA risk, while age showed a marginal trend toward significance.

At the global structure level, the NCT revealed that the difference in network structure between the two groups did not reach conventional statistical significance (structure invariance test: p = 0.064), though a marginal trend toward significance was observed.

PAH results showed a moderate correlation with a marginal trend toward significance, while aldehyde results showed no association.

Regarding the acceptance and perceived benefits dimension, no statistically significant differences between-group mean differences were found at any of the three time points, with only a marginal trend toward significance at T1.

Sex showed a marginal trend toward significance, while age and screw length were not significant predictors.

Results The SO group presented a significantly greater BMI, fat (%), glucose, a marginal trend toward significance for uric acid, and IL-6 compared to the NSO group.

P values of 0.05 were considered indicative of statistical significance while a P value of 0.1 was considered indicative of a marginal trend toward significance.

Employment status also showed a weak association (OR = 1.17, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.99–1.38, p = 0.06), indicating a marginal trend toward significance.

However, some p-values exhibited a marginal trend toward significance, particularly when comparing pigs with humans lacking B. coli ASVs ( Table 3 ).

Although central TMH, the nasal bulbar redness score, and the mean redness score reached a significant difference, there was only a marginal trend toward significance in the OSDI score, TBUT, assessable time of TBUT, temporal TMH, temporal limbal bulbar redness score, and assessable area of bulbar redness.