The normalized tracer intensity in uveoscleral outflow was the highest at the 11 o'clock location and lowest at the 3 o'clock location, with a marginal trend toward significance ( P = 0.0579) between these 2 clock hour locations.
← all phrases
“a marginal trend toward significance”
Sighted at
p=0.052
In the literature
Stratified analysis by gender revealed that there was a statistically significant difference in CD3+CD4+ mitochondrial lymphocyte count in male patients (p = 0.014) and a marginal trend toward significance in female patients (p = 0.058).
And, the mean duration of DHCA and the lowest nasopharyngeal temperature were longer and lower in the PH group, which showed a marginal trend toward significance (P=0.058).
A marginal trend toward significance ( p = 0.058) was observed for both age and season.
In addition, patients in the cisplatin/5-fluorouracil group had higher grade 3–4 radiation mucositis/esophagitis compared with patients in the weekly cisplatin group, but it only reached a marginal trend toward significance (39% versus 9%, P = 0.059).
A marginal trend toward significance was noted between IPD and AL (β = 0.078; 95% CI: −0.003 to 0.160; p = 0.059). 3.4.
RPS6KA4 , POTEM , and TYRO3 showed a marginal trend toward significance in multivariate Cox analyses ( p = 0.06, 0.06, and 0.09; HR = 0.15, 0.16, and 1.43, respectively).
Total defoliation was lower with higher Shannon’s diversity index at the plot level, but with a marginal trend toward significance ( t = -2.36, P = 0.062).
By contrast, accuracy for low‐, medium‐, and high‐similarity images did not differ from chance, although the high‐similarity condition showed a marginal trend toward significance (Mean ACC = 0.558, p = 0.0628).
Functional recovery and pain score The evaluation of postoperative functional recovery and pain relief indicated that, regarding wrist joint function,he Cooney wrist joint function score for the 3D printing group at 12 months post-surgery was higher than that of the control group, with a marginal trend toward significance ( P = 0.067).
Exposure to trauma showed a marginal trend toward significance (B = 0.484, p = 0.069), suggesting that adolescents who had experienced any trauma were somewhat more likely to have a history of depression.
Coparenting relationship only showed a marginal trend toward significance ( β = −0.071, p < 0.070).
There was, however, a marginal trend toward significance [ t (47) = 1.84, p = 0.07, d = 0.53], whereby ratings in the failure condition tended to be higher than in the loss condition.
While Friends support showed a marginal trend toward significance, β = −0.23, t(79) = −1.80, p = 0.077, Family support did not uniquely contribute to the model, β = 0.02, t(79) = 0.17, p = 0.863.
In contrast, the main effect of group showed a marginal trend toward significance ( p = .080), suggesting that collaboration may have helped mitigate interference relative to individual performance.
In CKD 2, hemoglobin displayed a non-significant trend (β = −.6, 95% CI [−1.4, 0.1], P = .1) while age showed a marginal trend toward significance (β = .33, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.7], P = .08).
NAs showed a marginal trend toward significance (χ2(9)=15.20, p=0.086).
However, the interaction between training condition and school showed a marginal trend toward significance ( p = 0.087).
Additionally, memory confidence judgment accuracy (MCJA) showed a marginal trend toward significance between the two conditions, F (1, 34) = 3.05, p = 0.090, η p 2 = 0.08.
However, only a marginal trend toward significance emerged from the analysis (Fisher exact test, p = 0.091).
Patient Health Questionnaire-15 exhibited a marginal trend toward significance in group by time interaction ( P = .096).
An Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression with SHAP values as the dependent variable, and ML group and P/E2 ratios as predictors showed a significant effect of the ML group (p = 0.015) and a marginal trend toward significance of the ML∗P/E2 ratio interaction (p = 0.100).
However, there was a marginal trend toward significance between low registration in the Japanese version of the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile and Galvanic skin response (r s = 0.231, p < 0.10; r s = 0.219, p < 0.10), suggesting that self-rated sensitivity was not necessarily associated with objective measures.
Variables exhibiting a marginal trend toward significance ( p < 0.10) in the univariate analysis were subsequently entered into a multivariate binary logistic regression model using a forward stepwise selection method to identify independent risk factors for post‐ischemic stroke UTI while limiting multicollinearity.
P values of 0.05 were considered indicative of statistical significance while a P value of 0.1 was considered indicative of a marginal trend toward significance.