Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a favorable trend”

1,336 sentences · 1,336 papers · 2,253 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a favorable trendp = 0.091.8× alphagold
Patients receiving the accommodative IOL referred more frequent visual disturbances with the exception of halos and vision difficulties at long distances, which occurred more in the FIL611PV group ( p < 0.001 in all cases). At 6-months after surgery all subjects referred a favorable trend towards glasses/contact lenses independence for far distances ( p = 0.09).
a favorable trendP = .102.0× alphagold
Among well-established predictors of ICI outcomes, 31 - 35 EBV status was not significantly associated with overall survival in patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy although a favorable trend was observed (hazard ratio [HR], 3.86e-08 [95% CI, 0 to infinity]; log-rank test P = .10; Fig 3 A).
a favorable trendp = 0.112.2× alphagold
The UA showed better IPFS rates significantly related to male sex ( p = 0.049), a BED 12 of ≥42 Gy ( p = 0.006), and controlled extracranial disease ( p = 0.03); in the MA, a favorable trend towards LC ( p = 0.11) and higher BED ( p = 0.11) schedules maintained a correlation with improved IPFS rates, although statistical significance was not reached.
a favorable trendP = 0.112.2× alphagold
13 In contrast, another randomized phase II trial ( n = 101) comparing induction chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus induction DCF highlighted the importance of radiotherapy (RT) for effective local control and survival improvement for unresectable LAESCC (cT4b); a favorable trend in 2-year OS for the CRT group (55.1% versus 34.7%, P = 0.11), although not statistically significant. 14 While R0 resection rates were similar (∼77%) and distant metastasis tended to be less frequent with DCF, induction CRT significantly reduced locoregional recurrence (local: 8% versus 30%, P = 0.03; regional: 8% versus 37%, P = 0.002).
a favorable trendp = 0.11742.3× alphagold
Results indicated statistically significant benefit favoring CD-LD ER over CD-LD IR for PGI-C, CGI-C, percent of patients self-rated as much or very much improved and percent of patients clinician-rated as much or very much improved across all three dyskinesia groups except PGI-C for the TD group where a favorable trend ( p = 0.1174) was noted.
a favorable trendP = 0.1202.4× alphagold
In a recent phase III trial in Korean patients with ED-SCLC, although OS and PFS were not significantly different between the EP and IP arms, there was a favorable trend toward the IP regimen (OS, 10.9 months vs. 10.3 months, P = 0.120; PFS, 6.5 months vs. 5.8 months, P = 0.115).