Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a clear trend”

19,461 sentences · 19,461 papers · 31,348 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a clear trendp = 0.0060.1× alphagold
On exposure to poly:IC this was not significant, but there was a clear trend (Pam3Cys IL-1β pooled patient data versus controls p = 0.006; Pam3Cys IL-6 pooled patient data versus controls p = 0.037; poly:IC IL-1β pooled patient data versus controls p = 0.058; poly:IC IL-6 pooled patient data versus controls p = 0.115).
a clear trendp -value = 0.0070.1× alphagold
When recurrence rates were not stratified by keloid size (including both lesions smaller than 5 cm and those larger than 5 cm) a clear trend emerged indicating that Group 1 was the least effective treatment, both in the short term (6 months, p -value = 0.007) and in the long term (2 years, p -value = ( p ≤ 0.001).
a clear trendP = .00790.2× alphagold
Conversely, there is a clear trend towards increased glycolytic capacity associated with T cell CD69 expression, including in CD4 + naïve (3.38 versus 38.55%, P = .0079), CD4 + TCM (5.65 versus 37.50%, P = .0317), CD8 + naïve (3.80 versus 34.05%, P = .0159) and CD8 + TEM (10.83 versus 44.11%, P = .0317) populations ( Fig. 7D ).
a clear trendP=0.00890.2× alphagold
Among the HLA class II alleles, anti-SLA/LP-positive AIH patients showed a clear trend of higher frequency in DRB1*04:01, DRB1*04:05, DRB1*14:01, and DRB1*16:02 alleles compared with healthy patients (8.1% vs . 1.6%, P=0.0089/Pc=0.2139; 21.0% vs . 10.4%, P=0.0201/Pc=0.2139; 3.2% vs . 0.2%, P=0.0334/Pc=0.2139; 12.9% vs . 5.2%, P=0.0411/Pc=0.2139, respectively), and a clear trend of lower frequency in the DRB1*15:01 HLA allele (14.5% vs . 27.4%, P=0.0312/Pc=0.2139) ( Table 4 ).
a clear trendP = .010.2× alphagold
When patients were categorized into 3 subgroups based on NMRRF count (≤1, 2, and ≥3 NMRRFs), all exhibited significantly lower recurrence rates, highlighting a clear trend in which fewer NMRRFs led to greater reductions (≤1: AHR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.34-0.50] and 2: AHR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.41-0.57]; P = .01 for interaction) (eFigure 5 in Supplement 2 ).
a positive trendp < .010.2× alphagold
a clear trendp = .5210.4× alphagold
While the analysis with the retweeted users shows a positive trend for the coreness over time ( b = 0.1096, t (119) = 3.04, p < .01; see also appendix), we could not identify a clear trend for the closeness centrality over time ( b = 9.426e-09, t (119) = 0.65, p = .52).