Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP = 2.81 × 10 −590.0× alphaqualifiedgold
While ungrouping identical subclones reduced hemimethylation values at both the Gtl2 - and IG-DMRs, from 31.8 to 29.8 and 8.4 to 6.1%, respectively (Additional file 3 : Table S2, Additional file 4 : Table S3), the difference in hemimethylation levels between the primary IG-DMR and the secondary Gtl2 -DMR remains highly significant as assessed using a Chi-squared test of independence ( P = 2.81 × 10 −59 ).
highly significantp = 8.21 e − 580.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For faces, the comparison between w -based and VGGFace-1-based encoders shows no significant difference (2-Sample T-Test; t (1918) = −0.2859, p = 0.78) but we found highly significant differences when comparing w -based encoders with VGGFace-3 (2-Sample T-Test; t (1918) = 16.5817, p = 8.21 e − 58) and with VGGFace-5 (2-Sample T-Test; t (1918) = 15.0820, p = 1.17 e − 48).
quite significantp = 10 −570.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The two partial correlations were both quite significant ( f versus txn rate/tlns per mRNA | protein production rate, complex membership: Spearman partial r = 0.227, n = 4,746, p = 10 −57 ; complex membership versus txn rate/tlns per mRNA | protein production rate, f: Spearman partial r = 0.147, n = 4,746, p = 10 −24 ), suggesting that fitness effect and protein complex membership are independently associated with the expression strategy that minimizes stochastic fluctuation.
highly significantP =1.82E-570.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Finally, we note that there is a highly significant co-occurrence of 9p21.3 deletion (arm or focal) and 9p24.1 deletion (arm or focal) ( P =1.82E-57), and focal deletion of 9p21.3 and 9p24.1 ( P =2.03E-07), suggesting that the effects seen for 9p21.3 loss (e.g., on PD-L1 expression) are likely due to simultaneous co-deletion of 9p24.1. 9p24.1 SCNA Associations With TME Phenotype in Independent HPV – HNSC Validation Cohort.
tendency towards significancep = 1.88 × e −570.0× alpha
Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant main effect of time and treatment, but only a slight tendency towards significance for time*treatment interaction (main effect of time: F(7.860,337.984) = 56.832, p = 1.88 × e −57 , ηp 2 = 0.569; main effect of treatment: F(4,43) = 5.973, p = 0.0006, ηp 2 = 0.357; time*treatment: F(31.440,337.984) = 1.396, p = 0.082, ηp 2 = 0.115).
highly significantP = 4 × 10 –560.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This difference in the number of place fields was highly significant across the recorded population of CA1 and CA3 neurons (Fig. 2a , bottom; Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P = 4 × 10 –56 )—in each of the three different large-scale tunnels (see the individual bats and tunnels in Fig. 2a , top, and Extended Data Fig. 3a ).