Analysis of biopsies from all 25 NB patients revealed a highly significant correlation between stage IV NB and nuclear localization of FOXO3 (P<0.0001) and pFOXO3-T32 (Figure 1B , ANOVA).
Excerpts
Temperature had a highly significant impact on the pH value of the silage feed ( p < 0.0001).
The relative risk of each stage by sex (women/men) was: Stage 1 , 0.72 (more in men); Stage 2 , 1.11; Stage 3 , 1.68; and Stage 4 , 9.29 (all three more in women); these sex-differences were highly significant (overall χ 2 [d f = 3] = 51.3, p < 0.0001).
Concerning aerated areas, the results showed highly significant differences in the attenuation values for both lungs in sedated animals compared to those during spontaneous breathing under anesthesia ( p < 0.0001) and during induced apnea ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 1 ).
The results are highly significant (p<0.0001, Table 2 ), and indicate that MYC IHC can identify a set of tumors with transcriptional profiles resembling those previously categorized as mBL.
Multiple regression analysis of the experimental data yielded the following second-order polynomial equation (Equation (1)), which describes the relationship between the response variable and the independent variables: (1) Oil yield (%) = 33.84 + 0.5783A + 0.8342B + 0.4008C + 0.8633D + 0.5550AB + 0.2425AC + 0.1675AD + 0.6150BC − 0.2725BD + 0.2550CD − 2.08A 2 − 1.31B 2 − 2.09C 2 − 1.32D 2 As shown in Table 3 , the regression model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit test was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating that the model is statistically valid and well-fitted to the experimental data.
This analysis showed a highly significant positive correlation between the two datasets for both the SLC transporters (r = 0.9157, P < 0.0001) and the ABC transporters (r = 0.8368, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 , Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 ), providing further confidence in our approach.
Specifically, rmpA , rmpA2 , and iucA showed the strongest associations, with absolute differences in reporting frequency exceeding 20 percentage points and highly significant statistical support ( p < 0.0001 for all comparisons).
Obtaining a tumor-free surgical margin decreases the incidence of a local recurrence (LR) of the primary tumor.[ 18 ] There are various risk factors associated with a positive margin, among them are: The extent of excision, age, large tumor size, multifocality, lobular histological type, and the number of positive lymph nodes.[ 19 ] In 30 of 34 reviewed studies, persistent microscopic inadequate (R1) or macroscopic inadequate (R2) surgical margins were highly significant for LR compared to the negative margin (p = 0.0001).[ 20 ] Microscopic disease resulting from a positive margin is more problematic because theoretically, cancer in the relatively hypoxic environment of the lumpectomy scar bed will be resistant to radiation therapy.[ 21 ] Furthermore, the inability to achieve negative margins may be a marker of an excessive tumor burden in the treated breast.
GDF-15 showed the most robust response, with highly significant main effects for both time and dose and a strong interaction ( p < 0.0001).
Notably, cadaverine, N-acetylcadaverine, choline, tryptophan, and glycine exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001).
The correlation coefficient ( r ) in all tests between the two methods was statistically extremely significant at P <0.0001.
Highly significant correlations ( P < 0.0001) were observed between all the four neutralization assays employed in this study ( Fig. 4E–J ).
FT wAUROC was also highly significant in 141 patients with diabetes 0.80 (0.78–0.82; P<0.0001).
In TSH alterations, the diagnostic method was highly significant (QM = 97.71, p < 0.0001; R2 = 98.9%).
The regressions implicating altitude and latitude of provenances were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), resulting in R 2 ranging between 0.21 and 0.51 (Table 2 ).
aegypti genes are without introns compared to 33% of the EZGs, and this difference is highly significant (P<0.0001).
With all three stimulation probes, despite the difference in design, a highly significant lowering in blood pressure was achieved with a p = 0.0001 according to the Wilcoxin Signed-Rank test.
This represents a highly significant difference in cell cycle progression ( P < .0001 by χ 2 analysis).
The results revealed that treatment had a highly significant effect on isoflavonoid levels ( p < 0.0001), indicating that treatment (control vs. infected) significantly influences isoflavonoid concentrations ( Supplementary Table S2 ).
As the probability (p-) column indicates, all main effects—distracter level, formant swing extent, the size of f0 separation, and assignment of the higher f0 to target or distracter—were highly significant with p = 0.0001, both within and across subjects.
A highly significant difference between the isolates was found by the study ( F = 1.46 × 10 29 , p < 0.0001), suggesting that strains differed greatly in their antioxidant activity.
Regardless of such variability in RA patients, there was a clearly significant difference between both groups (RA mean 1.2 ± 3.18% [0–19.50%] vs. healthy control mean 0.07 ± 0.1% [0–0.59%], p < 0.0001, Fig. 3 b upper panel).
Overlay images of the red and green channels from immunofluorescence co-staining demonstrated distinct patterns of expression, where analysis of MOC K1 and K2 indicated a highly significant negative correlation (Spearman's correlation, −0.8767, p < 0.0001) between GPX4 and Vimentin protein levels ( Fig. 5 K).
The association between the sustained hypermotile phenotype and sub-micromolar inhibition of huPDE4 was highly significant with a Fishers exact p -value of <0.0001.