In replicated hydroponic experiments showing highly significant differences in seminal root length ( P < 0.0001) between 1RS and 1RW, we analyzed the aerial part of the plants.
Excerpts
6A ), but 12 days after the induction the difference was highly significant (p = 0.0001, Fig. 6A ).
The BMD measured at the right first molar tooth within the alveolar bone showed a highly significant regression with age (brightness = 166.8 − 1.3 × age, r = 0.65, P < 0.0001).
On the SCQ, the right lateral region showed a highly significant ( χ 2 = 21.82, p < 0.0001) age-by-region interaction.
Other parameters such as lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) were also decreased to a highly significant degree ( P < 0.0001).
The association between phaseolin type and cluster membership was highly significant and nearly complete (χ 2 = 174.72; df = 1; P < 0.0001; Cramér's V = 0.93).
A highly significant correlation between lactose and fructose malabsorption could also be noted (6.8% LI vs. 0.2% non-LI; P<0.0001; OR 31.06) ( Table 2 ).
The difference is highly significant using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Bonferroni corrected, p<0.0001).
All the correlations presented here are highly significant ( p < 0.0001) except when stated.
These differences in frequency are highly significant ( p < 0.0001 by the Fisher’s exact test).
While no significant differences were observed between DM-II patients and controls on figure recognition and verbal fluency tests, a highly significant difference (p<0.0001) between these two subgroups was seen on the 10×36 test.
timopheevii introgression lines showed highly significant variation across all traits (p <0.0001) ( Table 3 ) with a normal distribution for all seven traits ( Figure 2 ).
A second supportive multivariable analysis used baseline count as a covariate and in that analysis, the baseline term was not significant ( P = 0.627), treatment was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), but study site was not statistically significant ( P = 0.219).
These differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Exploratory analyses revealed a highly significant positive correlation between resting PP and SysSlope in both the concussion ( r 2 = 0.84, p < 0.0001) and control ( r 2 = 0.97, p < 0.0001) groups at 48 h (Week 1 data was also significantly correlated, but is not shown).
It is a nonparametric test that compares two unpaired sets of data significantly different when the p value is less than 0.05 (**** extremely significant P < 0.0001, *** extremely significant 0.0001 < P < 0.001, ** very significant 0.001 < P < 0.01, * significant 0.0.1 < P < 0.05 and ns not significant ≥ 0.05).
The two-way interaction of the condition and the surface was also highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001), indicating that polishing increased the microhardness values at the top and the bottom surface.
In this group, antibody levels were detected from 14 dpv, showing a highly significant increase ( p < 0.0001) from this timepoint until the end of the study.
This finding was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
A highly significant increase of both anti-al34k2 IgG1 and IgG4 levels was observed in PD2 by pairwise comparisons between paired samples ( n = 68, p < 0.0001; Figure 4B ); instead, only IgG4 levels showed a weakly significant increase after summer when all samples were considered ( p = 0.0326, Figure 4A ).
Between-group differences were statistically significant from early time points ( p < 0.01) and became highly significant at 6, 9 and 12 months ( p < 0.0001; Figure 1 A). 3.5.2.
This performance is further strengthened by highly significant global p -values in 2LOmb results from all three interaction problems ( p < 0.0001) and the presence of a SNP in common among some or all pairs of two-SNP units in the three- and four-locus interaction problems.
Combined correlation analyses using all protein analytes resulted in a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.0001) between DISSECT-flow and imaging data, and between DISSECT-flow and immunoblotting data.
Despite Fisher’s exact test showing a highly significant result ( p -value < 0.0001), the low phi coefficient suggests that this significance was likely due to the gender imbalance in the schizophrenia group, particularly the lower number of female participants.
The effect of time of day was highly significant (F 7,32 = 20.8; p <0.0001; Huyhn-Feldt epsilon = 0.75), with highest ratings in the forenoon that fell towards the evening.