Excerpts

The prevalence of MP in patients with prior abdomino-pelvic surgery was 9.2% (44/476) versus 1.1% (46/4282) in patients without prior abdomino-pelvic surgery, a statistically highly significant difference ( p =0.0001).

There was a significant trend towards outpatient treatment over the study period ( p < 0.0001).

A permutation test with 283 isolates belonging to a cluster showed highly significant temporal clustering of Campylobacter spp. isolates of identical genotype (p<0.0001).

The high-fat meal produced a decline after 4 weeks of placebo [ - 12.37% ( P = .005)], but no decline after 4 weeks of flavonoid supplement [ - 3.16% ( P = .663)], and the difference between the two responses was highly significant ( P < .0001).

The mean QoL domains scores showed a decreasing trend with increasing motor dysfunction of the child, with a statistical association for physical ( r = −0.327, P < 0.0001) and psychological domains ( r = −0.440, P < 0.0001).

The correlation between host- and Symbiodiniaceae δ 13 C values was strong and highly significant ( rho = 0.80; P < .0001) ( Fig. 2D ).

Based on the Tukey analysis, a highly significant difference in mortality of C. formosanus under flooded and unflooded conditions was observed in fipronil-treated sand at 1 ppm ( P < 0.0001).

However, this tendency was highly significant when considering all the sites (Jost’s combined significance test, p < 0.0001; Table S7 ).

Patients with no fibrosis (F0) were young as compared to those who developed liver fibrosis (F1‐F3) or liver cirrhosis (F4) with an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.0001) based on the analysis of one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test as presented in Table 2 .

SIRIUS follow-up results presented at ACC showed that the highly significant differences (p < 0.0001) between the CYPHER stent and bare metal control stent for all clinical event endpoints were sustained at 3-years.

Statistical analysis (independent t -tests) confirmed that these differences were highly significant from day 13 onward ( p < 0.0001).

GDP was a highly significant linear predictor of a diagnosis of PCP (p<0.0001).

Adding more biological replicates to the qPCR log 2 FC calculation decreased the correlation with the microarray log 2 FCs [ Supplementary Figure S2 (‘all samples’ linear regression model); r 2 = 0.703], but the linear regression model remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The differences in gene expression were highly significant for each gene individually (compared to normal B cells; p < 0.0001, Mann Whitney) and considered as a set ( p < 0.0001, Kruskall-Wallis).

This is confirmed by what is shown in Table 9 , where the results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the model as a whole was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and the model adequacy was confirmed by several statistical indicators.

One-way ANOVA revealed highly significant treatment effects on intracellular (IC: F = 1865.0, p < 0.0001) and extracellular (EC: F = 6150.3, p < 0.0001) TPC.

Furthermore, in all four regions, pairwise comparisons (Dunn’s test) of the frequency distributions of TBA values among locations with defoliation, mortality, or no damage showed highly significant ( p < 0.0001) differences between the three groups (Fig. 5 , Table 2 ).

We obtained highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001), indicating a clear batch effect.

The results showed that X 1 had an extremely significant effect on the performance of Au@AgNPs with P -value < 0.0001, X 2 and X 4 reached a significant level with P -value < 0.05, while X 3 , X 5 and X 6 had no significant effects on the performance of Au@AgNPs.

As expected, we found a highly significant trend for increased concentrations of leptin with increasing levels of overweight or obesity ( P < 0.0001).

Notably, there was a highly significant reduction ( p < 0.0001) at concentrations of 400 μg/ml and above, reaching maximum viability reduction after 5 min of laser irradiation (Fig. 7 A–D).

The results show a highly significant CONNECTIVE × EADV interaction (LRT = 56.92, p < 0.0001), see Table 6 and Figure 3 .

0.05 in controls), and the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

streptocerca nematode prevalence was 19.3% in rural areas (range 0%–80%) compared with 5.2% in semiurban areas (range 0%–23.1%), a highly significant difference (p<0.0001 by χ 2 test).

Patients showed an increasing trend for the prevalence of hepatic steatosis with fibrosis stage (Figure 1 (a), p = 0.0001).