Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Uric acid levels significantly improved the predictive performance of the R-IPI and NCCN-IPI scores, and in multi-state analysis, it emerged as a highly significant predictor of an increased risk of death without developing recurrence (transition-HR=4.47, 95% CI: 2.17–9.23, P <0.0001).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Optimization by Box–Behnken (BB) design Using inoculum size (E), temperature (F), and initial pH (H) as independent variables and inhibition rate (Y) as the response, a quadratic regression model was obtained with Design-Expert 13.0: .ANOVA demonstrated that the regression model was highly significant (P < 0.0001), with an R2 of 0.9928, indicating that 99.28% of the variation could be explained by the model.
extremely significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualified
In particular, compared with the level observed at 0 day, the expression of pbpG (fivefold), vpsI3 (eightfold), and farB (sevenfold) reached extremely significant levels at 15 days ( t = 14.08, df = 8, P < 0.0001), 10 days ( t = 29.66, df = 8, P < 0.0001), and 10 days ( t = 19.41, df = 8, P < 0.0001), respectively ( Figure 6 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis revealed that the differences in prevalence between the two time periods were highly significant for all three allergens: thiuram mix ( χ 2 = 1382.26, p < 0.0001), mercapto mix ( χ 2 = 179.58, p < 0.0001), and mercaptobenzothiazole ( χ 2 = 317.21, p < 0.0001). 3.2.4.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The antibody levels progressively increased with a subsequent booster dose, and all three immunized groups showed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) elevation in OD values compared to the unvaccinated mice at 35 dpv (OD values: 1.38 ± 0.00, 1.23 ± 0.01, and 0.91 ± 0.01 for vToH-QMV, vToH-DMV, and wt, respectively) ( Figure 3 B, Table S3 ).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the original validation study by McCreight et al., this questionnaire demonstrated excellent reliability and validity: it showed strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.8), good test-retest reliability, and significant discriminant validity, with a highly significant difference in total scores between metformin-intolerant and metformin-tolerant patients ( P < 0.0001) ( McCreight et al., 2018 ).