Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparison of the MO versus MO breathing histogram ( Figure S3B ; Figure 4A , gray trace) with the odor discrimination tasks revealed a highly significant difference ( Figure 4 ; Kolmogorov-Smirnov [K-S] test, p < 0.0001 for all odor pairs), indicating that increased sniffing occurred only when mice were conditioned to discriminate odors.
highly significantp < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Whereas correlations of PPAS-6 and PPAS-3 scores with job control at the within-subgroup level (r within ) were highly significant (p < .0001) according to both the R statistic and t-test, such correlations at the between-subgroup level (r between ) were not significant (p>.05). “ S2 Table ” in the supplement/appendix outlines the key indices of within-subgroup variability and interrater agreement in PPAS-6 and PPAS-3 scores among the same validation population subgroups used to assess factor invariance.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Likewise we found a highly significant dose-dependent effect across all treatments for the rate of adverse events leading to discontinuation ( p < 0.0001), yet a nonsignificant (retigabine, lacosamide) or small (eslicarbazepine; p = 0.0276) impact of dose variation on the rate of seizure freedom (most likely due to limitations of rare event analysis).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As r -equivalent and r -contrast ( Rosenthal & Rubin, 2003 ) can overestimate true population effect size ( Dunlap, Cortina, Vaslow, & Burke, 1996 ; Lakens, 2013 ), and not all studies reported sufficient information to recover sample or population standard deviations, we also computed a simple and conservative vote count test, which shows the obvious fact displayed in Figure 2 , that there is a highly significant overall serial dependence effect ( X 2 (1) = 20.8, p < 0.0001).
highly significantP = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Spearman’s correlations between the two dietary assessment instruments were moderate and highly significant for fruit ( r = 0.5123, P = 0.0001), fat ( r = 0.4326, P = 0.0010) and sugar ( r = 0.4079, P = 0.0020); while the vegetable measurement was more variable ( r = 0.3983, P = 0.0026).