Excerpts

The results of quantitation show ( Fig 2D ) a highly significant difference in deviation of the α7 G lung bronchiole surface from smoothness following CS exposure from that of the control (P<0.0001).

The preference for reachable locations was highly significant ( χ 2 test, two nearest LEDs against the three farthest ones, P<0.0001).

We did find an effect on the latency of CR onset ( Supplementary Table 4 ; F (13, 713) = 2.28, p = 0.005; ANOVA on LME) and also we observed a significant trend ( Supplementary Table 4 ; F (13, 3133) = 3.35, p < 0.0001; ANOVA on LME) for a temporal shift of the CR peak.

Caries was more prevalent in adolescents and adults compared to children, with a highly significant difference (p = 0.0001).

While no significant differences were observed between DM-II patients and controls on figure recognition and verbal fluency tests, a highly significant difference (p<0.0001) between these two subgroups was seen on the 10×36 test.

Although one M form swarm was found over bare ground, the association between swarm markers and swarm molecular form was highly significant ( χ 2 = 56.92, d.f. = 3, p < 0.0001).

These findings were further clarified by the highly significant interaction between type of distractor and set size, F (3, 165) = 16.11, p <.0001.

Potassium and BP changes in the entire population Spironolactone caused a highly significant increase in the potassium level of 0.5 +/-0.5 mmol/L (p <0.0001) in the entire study population ( Table 2 ).

The results were also subjected to multivariate analysis, if the difference between the variables on univariate analysis was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The global F ST / R ST value at 0.34/0.64 was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), signaling a substantive genetic differentiation among the populations as a whole, and most of the pairwise comparisons displayed a pronounced level of genetic differences (> 0.25).

There was a highly significant inverse correlation between pulsatile stress and baroreflex gain in patients with type 2 diabetes ( r = −0.719; P = 0.0001) but not in overweight/obese control subjects ( r = −0.272; NS).

InsuTAG scores ranged from 0.55 to 132.07 across the whole participant group with a median (25 th –75 th percentile) InsuTAG score of 7.22 (4.04–11.33) There is a strong and highly significant positive correlation between InsuTAG and HOMA-IR (r = 0.86; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1 ) when compared with the association between HOMA-IR and the other lipid indices, TyG index (triglycerides × glucose) (r = 0.43; p < 0.001) and TG/HDL-C ratio (r = 0.38; p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

Evaluation of Body Weight, Body Mass Index, Visceral, and Subcutaneous Fat Deposits The results in Table 2 show that after 6 weeks of HFD feeding, rats in the groups DC, Metformin 180 mg/kg, AESS 100, AESS 200, and AESS 400 mg/kg showed highly significant (P < .0001) gain in body weight compared to NC animals.

Genotyping of these markers in the FG/FZ strain revealed a highly significant difference in the distribution of genotypes between the dead and alive mosquitoes for all the nets (χ 2 > 20; p < 0.0001) ( Figure S4 ).

LACE score was highly significant as a predictor of readmission (p<0.0001), with an AUC of 0.773 (95% CI 0.768 to 0.779) and R 2 of 0.180.

This revealed a highly significant correlation with R 2 = 0.42 and P < 0.0001 (Figure 3c ).

We observed a moderate, but highly significant sensitization of cells after Jarid1A depletion with siRNAs A1+A3 as compared to untransfected (p < 0.0001) and control-transfected (p = 0.0025) cells ( Fig 4 ).

For instance, decreasing the incubation temperature from 37 to 30°C or room temperature, had a highly significant effect on the total aerobic count for samples collected from the low care zone ( p < 0.0001).

The main effect of ROIs was highly significant at the three thresholds ( F (5,233) = 18.99, p < 0.0001; F (5,201) = 12.80, p < 0.0001 and F (5,107) = 4.36, p < 0.0001), and interactions were observed between Age Group and ROIs in all but the most stringent threshold ( F (1,233) = 14.99, p = 0.0001; F (1,201) = 7.85, p = 0.006 and F (1,107) = 0.03, p = 0.864).

Bartlett's test of sphericity, which is sensitive to smaller sample sizes, was highly significant ( p > 0.0001) ( Worthington and Whittaker, 2006 ).

χ 2 test comparison of incidence and prevalence over the periods 2007 to 2014 (mean incidence 1.01/10,000, mean prevalence 0.88/10,000) and 2015 to 2021 (mean incidence 0.67/10,000, mean prevalence 0.33/10,000) showed a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.0001).

The mean difference of 8.73 was found to be statistically highly significant (P<0.0001).

These plots display that while cadence is not different between TD and CPH groups, there was a 22.0% decrease in walking speed in the CPH group ( P < 0.0001) and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) increases in knee flexion in stance phase (21.57° increase in CPH), swing phase (14.57° increase in CPH), initial contact (IC) (35.53° increase in CPH) and overall (18.58° increase in CPH) ( Fig. 6C and D ).

The second-order similarity (i.e., correlation between pairwise cosine similarity matrices) between the McRae norms and the CSLB norms is highly significant (Spearman rho; for all 415 items, rho = .624, p < .0001).

Conversely, there was an increasing trend in the proportion of tetracycline-resistant Salmonella spp. in chickens ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 1 a).