Excerpts

In contrast, for the PPS reverters ( n = 35), the correlation was highly significant, r = +0.73 ( P < 0.0001).

ANOVAs revealed a highly significant variation among these groups in both these traits (F 3, 109 = 38.4, P < 0.0001 and F 3, 107 = 28.9, P < 0.0001, respectively).

Highly significant correlations for GPI-AP deficiency were found within one cell lineage ( r 2 = 0.61–0.95, p < 0.0001) and between the different cell lineages ( r 2 = 0.49–0.88, p < 0.0001).

A GLM with a negative binomial distribution with a log link function showed a highly significant positive effect of nest type on the number of trips per female [slope = 2.902, t = 7.078, P < 0.0001, dp = 1.119; dp is the dispersion parameter of the model, and when this is 1, the dispersion of the data from the model is within the predicted variance from the model (meaning the model fitted well to the observed data)].

Results of the Cochran–Armitage trend test revealed a significant decreasing trend in rates of involuntary hospitalization (15.94% in 2006 and 0.78% in 2019, Z = 5.33, p < 0.0001 ) and an increasing trend in LAI use at discharge among involuntarily hospitalized individuals (16.77% in 2006 and 50.00% in 2019, Z = 6.81, p < 0.0001 ).

All main effects such as genotype, trial, and their interaction, were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for all studied traits.

In contrast, the mean urinary melatonin level was significantly lower in stroke cases (7.18 ± 1.91 ng/mL) than in controls (14.26 ± 1.98 ng/mL), and this difference was very highly significant (t = 19.93, p < 0.0001).

The case–control difference (∼2.24 kb) in mean length was highly significant only in the Baltic region ( p < 0.0001).

The according risk of developing oral cancer was 0.65% and 0.18%, whereby the risk difference of 0.47% was highly significant ( p < 0.0001; Log-Rank test).

The Phase effect was highly significant [ F (3, 12) = 42.1, p < 0.0001] simply reflecting the fact that the different phase have different durations.

However, at 64 μg/mL and above, the difference became highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with Col-SeNPs consistently producing larger inhibition zones.

A highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) was evident, with a more than tenfold higher totally settled amount of ACAM 2 if the chamber setup was cleaned with Cleaning method II as compared to Cleaning method I.

Additionally, we noted the levels of hematocrit (HCT) increased significantly over time after infection with a mean count of 31.6, 35.3 (p = 0.0001) and 37.7 (p<0.0001) % at 1, 2, and 3 d.p.i., respectively, when compared to 29.2% in uninfected mice ( Fig 3K ).Thrombocyte (PLT) counts showed a decreasing trend, albeit insignificant, at the early phase of infection, that gradually rebound to thrombocytosis at the peak of infection with a mean count of 952 K/uL (p<0.0001) at day 3 p.i., when compared to those measured before infection with a mean count of 484 K/uL ( Fig 3E ).

The overall comparison between the four groups combined showed highly significant differences in zABSI (Kruskal–Wallis H = 76.5, p < 0.0001).

A considerable elevation in the expression levels of all assessed markers—TNF-alpha, IL-1β, c-Fos, BDNF, Nfl, and GFP—was noted in the ISO-induced group, exhibiting extremely significant differences relative to the control group ( p < 0.0001).

The comparative action of the extract’s activity according to concentration showed that whatever the concentration (from 5 to 25 mg/mL) the dichloromethane extract showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) compared to the other active extracts.

The results show that greater vegetated land cover was a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) negative predictor of AL indicating a beneficial effect of exposure (Table 6 ).

In subsequent visits up to the fifth visit, both chlorpromazine and risperidone showed a gradual decline in the mean score of the symptoms to the extent of 20 for chlorpromazine and 14 for risperidone, which were highly significant ( P =0.0001).

Parenthesis and asterisks represent significant ( p = 0.01–0.05 (*)), very significant ( p = 0.001–0.01 (**)) and extremely significant ( p = 0.0001–0.001 (***) and p < 0.0001 (****)) statistical differences.

This difference is highly significant ( χ 2 = 3716.3, d.f. = 1, p < 0.0001).

Despite its simplicity, our model was highly significant (P<0.0001) and explained 24% of the variation in the occurrence of stop codons among introns.

Differences in green-red channel ratiometric pixel intensities between front and back were highly significant ( Figure 10G,M ; p<0.0001, Mann–Whitney test).

Also association of stigma with quality of life showed highly significant findings in both genders (p< 0.0001) on all the domains of DLQI.

Data were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (* p < 0.05, significant; ** p < 0.01, very significant; *** p < 0.001, highly significant; **** p < 0.0001, extremely significant). 3.

Other parameters such as lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) were also decreased to a highly significant degree ( P < 0.0001).