In this model, the effect of time post alloHSCT on hemoglobin levels was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.259).
Excerpts
• HER2 status and HER2/CEP17 ratio: A highly significant association was found (P = 0.0001).
The correlation of inter-electrode distance with inter-electrode PLI was very weak in all subjects at all frequency bands (median rho over frequency bands: −0.06<rho<0) with no clear direction, albeit highly significant in single subjects (maximal positive correlation: rho = 0.15, maximal negative correlation: rho = −0.19; p<0.0001) due to the high number of values (214*213/2 data points per subject).
We also detected an extremely significant correlation between N-glycan multiplicity and N-glycopeptide levels ( Figure 4B , Mann-Whitney test, p-value<0.0001).
Although these associations are highly significant ( P < 0.0001), the effect sizes are extremely small (ORs very close to 1.00).
On the other hand, the differences were highly significant (P<0.0001) in 2 of the 3 markers and the three different proliferation biomarkers all point into the same direction.
Payment Type (Per Transaction) In a sensitivity analysis classifying each payment into Grant, Hospitality, and Other categories, the Specialty × Payment Class interaction remained highly significant (F-statistic-ANOVA = 10.43, p < 0.0001).
The ANOVA results confirm that the model was highly significant, with F = 811.92 and p < 0.0001.
Photomicrographic quantitation via pixel counts of images (Figure 1 , panel C) showed that a highly significant (p < 0.0001) increase in collagen content in the treated rat lungs as compared to the control group.
cerevisiae ARSs and this degree of overlap is highly significant ( P -value < 0.0001, permutation test, see Methods) (Supplemental Data set S5).
Motility, biofilm formation, morphotype and Vi-antigen assay At the two time-points (six hours and 12 h of incubation), the difference in swarming motility was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
From the statistical analysis, desirable determination coefficients ( R 2 ), 0.9858 for CPT and 0.9912 for BA, were obtained for the calculated model; the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05); and the highly significant level obtained for the model ( p < 0.0001) indicated that it was precise and applicable.
The aspirin pH i recovery rate showed a highly significant difference in ΔpH/min compared to non-stimulated conditions, ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 2A ).
Carotenoids A highly significant quadratic response surface model ( F value = 34.51, p < 0.0001) was developed to describe carotenoid production by N . intermedia , demonstrating exceptional explanatory power with an R 2 of 0.9780 and an adjusted R 2 of 0.9496, whereas a high adequate precision ratio of 18.88 confirmed its reliability for prediction (Figure 3 ).
Visual outcome There was highly significant statistical difference between preoperative and postoperative visual acuity in group 1 ( P =0.0001), group 2 ( P =0.001), group 3 ( P =0.003), and group 4 ( P =0.002).
score was very strong and highly significant (ρ = 0.874, p < 0.0001).
Patient by patient calculation of the value of difference of the angle of IR between left and right hip revealed extremely significant difference (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test); a similar significant asymmetry between the left and right hip was found for the ER (p < 0.0001).
In our dataset, the centroid size may predict 8.5% of the total shape changes and there is a highly significant covariation between the bony labyrinth shape and the centroid size (p-value < 0.0001).
Under cold conditions, the analysis revealed a highly significant effect of genotype ( p < 0.0001), indicating that Salinas consistently exhibited higher germination than US96UC23 across all time points ( Figure 1 b).
Although the average distance between the amino and carboxyl termini is small (∼6 nm), it is highly significant ( P < 0.0001), illustrating the power of our methods.
Pearson's correlation analysis revealed a moderately significant relationship between soil respiration and soil temperature at 5 cm depth (0.5936; p < .0001), 10 cm depth (0.5046; p < .0001), and air temperature (0.4684; p < .0001), suggesting that the R s tends to increase with soil and air temperatures.
PRO was significantly higher in all groups except the WNF‐L group, with highly significant increases in the FOS‐H and SDF‐H groups ( p < .0001).
Results: The preparatory online modules had a significant effect (p=0.044) on the ECL of the scenario leaders, with the CG having an increasing trend over four sessions (b=0.33, p=0.0016) and the OG having a decreasing trend over four sessions (b=-0.16, p<0.0001).
The differences in latency to lay between large and small focal worms paired with matched or unmatched partners were highly significant (GLM; focal worm category [small]: (β = 1.025 ± 0.210, χ 2 = 25.386, df = 1, P < 0.0001; partner’s size: [unmatched]: (β = 0.434 ± 0.192, χ 2 = 5.625, df = 1, P = 0.018).
5 ; Table 5 revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) intra-nucleosomal DNA fragmentation in hepatocytes of the ACR group, evidenced by high smear in the DNA band and low OD value at 260 nm, compared to the control and treated groups.