Using independent t -test for the out-of-pocket expenditure incurred during ANC Visits at government and private health set up, it was found that there was highly significant difference between governments and private expenditures for registration, Ultrasonography (USG), laboratory tests, medicines ( P < 0.0001) and transportation ( P = 0.001).
Excerpts
Highly significant increases in glutamate were noted in the CEA (p<0.0001) and BLA (p<0.0001; Fig. 6A ).
The age difference between the two scan angle groups was highly significant (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.0001).
Conversely, there was an increasing trend in the proportion of tetracycline-resistant Salmonella spp. in chickens ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 1 a).
Coefficients for the first three cycles are relatively strong and highly significant (p<.0001), while those for the last three cycles are weaker and minimally or not significant.
Results were annotated as follows: p < 0.05 (*; significant), p < 0.001 (**; highly significant), and p < 0.0001 (***; very highly significant).
These results prove notable differences in the size of the glomeruli, which are highly significant with p < 0.0001.
The prevalence of LBP was highly significant (p < .0001) among girls (confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 3.2; OR: 2.2), those who felt their school satchel was heavy (CI: 1.7 to 3.5; OR: 2.4) and those who watched television (TV; CI: 0.03 to 0.28; OR: 0.09).
The analysis of variance of phenotypic data revealed a highly significant effect of the genotype ( P < 0.0001) on the disease incidence, with no significant differences observed between replications ( P = 0.38).
However, these differences might be expected if the PH assumption is violated; each prognostic factor had highly significant tests for PH assumption violation based on Schoenfeld residuals in model (c) ( P <0.0001).
Taken together, the BoAstV CH13/NeuroS1 infection that we detected by ISH and IHC in approximately 1/3 of cattle diagnosed with non-suppurative encephalitis, while negative controls remained unstained, clearly shows a correlation with the disease, which is supported by an extremely highly significant statistical correlation (two-tailed p < 0.0001). 3.2.
All were highly significant ( P <0.0001).
Correlations were also highly significant (p=0.0001) for NFF among different trails, with the coefficients ranging from 0.36 to 0.46.
The control variable cohorts that demonstrated a highly significant association with increased case rates include physicians of male gender (p<0.0001), with 5–14 years of practice (p<0.05).
The age-specific HSV-2 seroprevalence of HIV-infected men was 23.9% for the 20s, 48.6% for the 30s, 57.1% for the 40s and 69.2% for the 50s, respectively, showing an increasing trend by age ( p <0.0001).
Results: The increase in CD4 cell counts was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).
In particular, a highly significant ORR was seen in patients who developed skin disorders ( P = 0.0001), vitiligo ( P = 0.0004) and thyroid dysfunctions ( P = 0.0127) ( Supplementary Table S4 ).
Correspondingly, the trend analysis for GrimAge2Accel across SII tertiles was also highly significant ( p < 0.0001), reinforcing the positive relationship.
Of the 378 pairwise tests conducted among 28 kelp populations, 370 were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and 6 were significant ( P < 0.05) after FDR correction ( Supplementary Table S5 ).
Temperature had a highly significant impact on the pH value of the silage feed ( p < 0.0001).
Subsequent categorical testing against the other biomarkers, clinical and paraclinical parameters still showed highly significant relations between CXCL13, MMP-9 and CXCL10 (p<0.0001 for all) and between CXCL13, MMP-9 and all CSF MS-risk parameters (p<0.0001 for all).
A two-way ANOVA with factors CT-DBS (pre, active, post) and hemisphere (left, right) showed greater spindle power in the left hemisphere [ F (1) = 6.483, p = 0.0177], as well as a highly significant main effect of CT-DBS condition [ F (2) = 20.411, p < 0.0001] ( Figure 4A , Table 1 ).
In both groups of workers, there was a highly significant difference in urinary cx-MiOP resulting from those in the control group (in both cases p < 0.0001).
There is a highly significant increase in age, in positive BRCA1 group; compared to negative BRCA1 group (p < 0.0001) while a non-significant difference as regards all the remaining basic clinical data (history of breast cancer, laterality, presenting symptoms and CA125 level) (p > 0.05) was found.
There was a highly significant interaction between mulch and the amaranth varieties in 2017 (F = 7.24, df = 8, 32; p < 0.0001) as well as in 2018 (F = 7.44, df = 8, 32; p < 0.0001).