Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP -value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
No significant differences in the prognostic value are noted between iPET-2 and i-PET-4 with both showing highly significant differences in EFS between the CMR and nCMR patients ( P -value < 0.0001): patients with iPET-2-CMR and iPET-2-nCMR had 3-y-EFS’s of 93.1% and 45.5%, respectively while the respective values for patients with iPET-4-CMR and iPET-4-nCMR were 89.5 and 39.4%.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In a cross-sectional study of 625 veterans with farming experience, baseline IL-10 concentrations from a whole blood assay were inversely associated with ΔTNF-⍺ (− r = 0.63) and ΔIL-6 (− r = 0.37) levels with results remaining highly significant (p < 0.0001) after adjusting for potential confounders 13 .
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
General impairment in episodic memory in post-traumatic stress disorder The overall analysis, including all memory tests and control groups from all 47 studies, shows a highly significant lower episodic memory performance in the PTSD group compared to controls ( d * = −0.50, p < 0.0001), which confirms our first hypothesis.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Based on the results of ANOVA, listed in the Supplementary Materials ( Table S1 ), the regression model for yield was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and the obtained coefficient of determination R 2 value was 0.9868 with a non-significant lack of fit ( p = 0.0557), showing a reasonable representation between the input parameters and the observed extraction yield.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The data presented in Figures 1(a) and 1(b) demonstrates that there was a highly significant increase in the expression of miR-181a-5p (4.56 ± 0.92-fold change, p < 0.0001) and miR-125b-2-3p (6.39 ± 0.68-fold change, p < 0.0001) in maternal peripheral blood of the RH-HDFN group compared with the control group.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the multivariate proportional hazards regression model that included IDLE, TNM staging, tumor grade, and the potential confounding variables (age at surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy received either before or after the surgery) ( Table 2 ), both TNM staging and tumor grade lost statistical association with cancer progression ( p > 0.63) when IDLE was included in the model, while the association of IDLE with progression was highly significant (HR = 5.671, 95% CI = 3.1650–10.1605, p < 0.0001).