The differences between the cadherin-expressing and the nonexpressing cells were highly significant at all time points (P < 0.0001) after day 2.
Excerpts
* represents P < 0.05, which means the difference is significant; ** represents P < 0.01, which means the difference is very significant; *** represents P < 0.001, which means the difference is extremely significant; **** represents P < 0.0001, which means the difference is more significant than ***; ns means the difference is not significant.
Results A co-existence of B7-H1 + T lymphocytes and FOXP3 + T regs was evidenced by the highly significant correlation of these molecules ( P < .0001) and their expression by different T lymphocyte subsets was clearly demonstrated.
Statistical analysis confirmed that the mechanical parameters of the pull-off test of the coatings were statistically highly significant for all samples ( p < 0.0001).
Comparison of regression lines by analysis of covariance (Prism, GraphPad) revealed that the differences between Cx43 slope and Cx26 or Cx40 slopes were extremely significant (P < 0.0001).
The regression coefficient associated with the number of trials between repetitions was negative and highly significant (p<0.0001; t-test, Equation 8 ).
3 , 12 Among the 32 nominally significant gene-based associations ( P < 1.00 × 10 − 4 ), six (18.75%) were issued from a missense|LC (i.e., low-confidence LoF variants) burden set, 19 (59.38%) were issued from a pLoF burden set, and seven (21.88%) were issued from a synonymous burden set ( Supplementary Figure S1 ).
We found a highly significant increase in the expression of Serum and glucocorticoid‐regulated kinase 1 ( Sgk1 , already 1 h after injection, two‐way ANOVA with Šidák's post hoc test, p < 0.0001) and Glucocorticoid‐induced leucine zipper protein ( Gilz / Tsc22d3 , 2 h after injection, p = 0.0015), both targets of GR transactivation.
melanogaster males were used as focal males, there was again a highly significant effect of rival treatment on the subsequent mating duration of focal D. melanogaster males (KW χ 5 2 = 35.714 , p < .0001; Figure 2 c).
All three assays showed highly significant linearity (p < 0.0001).
These findings underscore the substantial impact of the test treatment in promoting hair growth rate, with a highly significant p-value of <0.0001 (Figure 2 ).
Regarding retention scores, a highly significant treatment effect was found (H [3] = 21.24, p<0.0001).
The probability of saccades occurring within the 200–300 ms window showed an initial increase followed by a decreasing trend, with significant differences between easy and hard tasks (Fig. 7a , t 43 = 5.818, p < 0.0001, d = 1.774).
All four parameters reflected a highly significant differencebetween the newest and older regions (P < .0001).
It is interesting to note that difference between ApEn values in the two groups was highly significant (p = 0.0001).
Especially the JFM average patterns attain a very strong and highly significant correlation of r = 0.98 ( p = 1.0 × 10 - 4 ).
Moreover, we detected a highly significant difference (P < 0.0001) in tumor multiplicity, with 5.1 tumors per mouse in wt controls but only 1.1 tumors per mouse in Rage −/− animals ( Fig. 1 A , right).
The difference in transgene expression between vector doses was highly significant (P < 0.0001, by one-way ANOVA) demonstrating a dose response throughout the dosing regimens employed.
In a prospective, observational study, the statistical comparison relation was found to be highly significant (p<0.0001), showing that low serum cholinesterase value was associated with higher mortality [ 16 ].
All F ST values were highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
This difference is highly significant (p<0.0001, Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z = 4.121; ANOVA: F = 55.3).
In addition, these remained highly significant after exclusion of outliers ( r = −0.525, p < 0.0001 and r = −0.507, p < 0.0001, respectively; Figure 2 b).
Gal-9 induced a substantial, highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and dose-dependent increase in SARS-CoV-2 cell-surface attachment ( Figure 2 A).
A highly significant association was found between BANA with probing depth and clinical attachment level ( P ≤ 0.0001) and between BANA and the use of interdental aids ( P = 0.0168).
putida group showed a markedly significant drop ( p< 0.0001) in these variables compared to the P. putida group.