For all results, the differences were considered significant when p < 0.05, and they were regarded as extremely significant when p < 0.0001 presented by * and ***, respectively.
Excerpts
Indeed, we found a highly significant correlation between latency and rise time ( n = 42, R 2 = 0.43; p < 0.0001) and rise and decay time ( n = 42, R 2 = 0.21; p = 0.002).
The ANOVA analysis shows that there is a highly significant influence of the coffee variety ( p < 0.0001) and the raw material ( p < 0.0001) on methanol concentration.
Join tests shows that the interaction effect of BMI and menopause on the probability of developing endometrial cancer was highly significant (p=0.0001).
Second, all the model statistics were highly significant ( p < .0001), excepted for the inferior lateral ventricle model for AD which was only significant ( p < .05). 3.3 Classification based on multiple lifespan models To evaluate the classification performance of HAVAs on testing datasets, we performed a comparison with the three most discriminant structures.
In the Kruskal–Wallis analysis, the Ma QTL was supported with a highly significant (P < 0.0001) value of the K statistic, 15.9 for malic acid content.
The exposure rate of the study population varied from 23.6% to 28.0%, and there was a significant trend toward increased exposure rate over time ( p < 0.0001).
Quantitative analysis revealed an increase in the number of Ki-67+ cells in the RMS of prenatally irradiated juvenile rats compared to age-matched control animals, which was highly significant in the elbow part of the RMS (control: 27.63 ± 1.16 SEM, MWR: 35.46 ± 1.48 SEM, p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 1 B).
Plants that were excluded from pollinator visitation (−HP +CAGE) produced a mean of 0.45±0.15 SE seed/plant compared to plants open to pollinator visitation (−HP −CAGE) produced 2.37±0.35 SE seeds/plant, a highly significant difference ( t test, equal variance; t = 6.67, df = 172, p <0.0001).
Testing for CYP2C19 was more frequently requested in men (63%) than in women (37%) ( p = 0.0007), while CYP2D6 showed a highly significant predominance in women (94% vs. 6%, p < 0.0001, Fisher’s Exact test).
To test for the scalar invariance of the controlling-behavior items, the ∆CFI between the configural model and the scalar model was not within its recommended range of ≤ 0.002 [ 34 ], and the χ 2 difference test comparing the nested scalar model with the configural model was highly significant, at p <.0001.
It can be seen from Table A3 that the quadratic polynomial fit model is extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).
Gene set enrichment analysis identified a highly significant overlap of transcriptional markers of intestinal stem cells (chi‐squared test with Yates's correction, P < 0.0001; Munoz et al , 2012 ) between the gene lists, demonstrating elevated expression of some members of the intestinal stem cell signature following Huwe1 deletion.
The results showed that the variety effect was significant only for ADF, ADL and ME (p < 0.05), while the zone and by-products effects were highly significant (p < 0.0001) for all the parameters.
IgG-S(RBD) were detectable after the first vaccine dose in 49/50 (98%) naïve recipients but with very low titers that were boosted by the second vaccine dose resulting in a highly significant increase ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1d and Table 2 ).
Firmicutes: In contrast, Firmicutes, another dominant GM phylum, showed a significant increase following exercise, with an ES of 1.486 and a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001).
Survival analysis for this alteration showed that the difference between wild-type (WT) and NOTCH1 deletion patients was highly significant for both PFS (mPFS: 1.40 vs. 7.83 months; HR = 51.00, 95% CI: 4.80–540.00; P < 0.0001) and OS (mOS: 4.07 vs. 38.30 months; HR = 1 × 10 10 , 95% CI: 0-infinity; P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3G, H ).
There was a significant trend for association between serum BC and reported total fat intakes ( r = −0.002, p < 0.0001), but the association was not strong.
There was a highly significant, negative correlation between fALFF and Andrew's score ( Fig. 4 h; rho = −0.715, p < 0.0001; Spearman correlation test), suggesting that the amplitude of haemodynamic oscillations correlates not only to the overall changes in glial reactivity in each individual, but also to the spatial extent of the glial reactivity, and that the local presence of reactive glia is needed for this vasomotion amplification to occur.
Statistical significance for comparisons of drug responses across different numbers of cells per spot was determined using ordinary one‐way ANOVA, with highly significant differences ( **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01) for comparisons between different groups, while “NS” indicates a nonsignificant statistical difference between the data groups.
The model showed a highly significant value (p < 0.0001) (Table 3 ).
There was a highly significant change in ACTH levels observed in the M, ELb, Esch, and ELbEsch groups ( p < 0.0001), and a pronounced difference was seen in the EThy group ( p < 0.001), as shown in Figure 3 c.
In addition, the quadratic term X 3 2 (LOR2) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), along with a large negative coefficient (−272.987), confirming the strong nonlinear suppressive effect of higher LOR concentrations on the nanoparticle size.
This showed a highly significant increase between the second (1 week after the second dose) and third dose (2 weeks after the third dose) for Omicron (p < 0.0001), less for Beta (p < 0.005) and not significantly different for original WT and Delta VOCs ( Figure S2 ).
The reduction in AF burden was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) ( Table 2 ).