Excerpts

Change in UCVA in logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution from preoperative value to every follow-up postoperatively was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) in both the groups [ Figure 2 ].

SUV max and TBR GGO/consolidation There were highly significant group-wise differences ( p < 0.0001) across both the COVID-19 and BSTI classifications.

The highly significant reduction in the number of female offspring ( P < 0.0001, t -test with Bonferroni correction) was offset by the significantly higher number of male offspring compared with control ( P < 0.0001, t -test with Bonferroni correction).

The ANOVA for the fitted response surface model ( Table 4 ) indicates a highly significant model (Model F = 285.13, p < 0.0001).

Therefore, the interaction effect of genotype and feeding regimen reached statistical significance for latency time (F(1, 25) = 45.90, p < 0.0001 and F(1, 25) = 10.47, p = 0.0034, respectively), whereas a near-significant trend was evident for the number of buried marbles (F(1, 22) = 33.06, p < 0.0001 and F(1, 22) = 3.943, p = 0.05970, respectively).

The difference in 25(OH)D at visit 6 (16 weeks) was highly significant with mean difference of 40.5 ng/mL (95% CI: 32.8, 48.2; P < 0.0001).

Lukenda et al [ 48 ] studied transient elastography (TE) in 52 KTRs and reported a highly significant negative correlation of kidney allograft stiffness on SWE with eGFR in 52 KTRs ( r = -0.640; P < 0.0001).

The combination of both mucosal MMP-based parameters appeared as a highly significant discriminator (LR 20.30, P <0.0001) for subdivision of patients into good, intermediate and poor survivors as shown in Figure 1D .

A quantitative analysis on day seven revealed highly significant differences in the number, size and roundness of the spheroids generated by D5 cells compared to control NIH3T3 cells ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3 b).

Their distribution by generation is shown in Table 1 . The increased ratio after 1950 is highly significant statistically ( p < .0001).

2 ), the mean number of circulating CD20 + B cells in the 3 treated animals (0.04±0.2 B cells/μl blood) was 1000 fold lower compared to untreated animals (393±70 B cells/μl blood) and this difference was highly significant (p<0.0001, unpaired one tail T test).

This model was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), although it only explains a small fraction of the variance (Nagelkerke r 2 = 0.04).

5B,C , tumor growth was significantly inhibited by Trametinib exposure (p = 0.0009), while Everolimus-treated tumors did not significantly differ from vehicle control-exposed tumors in either their final size or their growth rate; however, combined treatment with Trametinib and Everolimus resulted in highly significant growth inhibition, as compared to either vehicle control (p = 0.0001) or single agent treatment (p = 0.003 for the comparison between Trametinib and combination; p = 0.0026 for the comparison between Everolimus and combination).

Employment status was also highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with employed respondents reporting more dissatisfaction, while students tended to be more satisfied.

The Analysis of Variance on memory performance on the three word categories across the two participant groups revealed a highly significant main effect of word category in both ISR ( F (2, 40) = 33.9, p < 0.0001) and DSR ( F (2, 34) = 48.4, p < 0.0001).

The predicted quadratic models were fitted due to their highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and excellent determination coefficient (R 2 = 0.9944).

The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a highly significant overall distribution difference among the three groups (A1, A2, A3) ( p < 0.0001).

These results are further corroborated by a meta-analysis carried out by the Cholesterol Treatment Trialist’s Collaboration, in which more versus less intensive statin therapy was associated with a highly significant 15% (95% CI = 11 to 18; P <0.0001) further reduction in major vascular events [ 6 ].

The association of CA IX overexpression and stem cells markers was highly significant (p<0.0001), constituting “the” hallmark of almost all the tumors with poor prognosis (Fig. 2 a , b ; Fig. 3 ).

The result of a trend test indicated there was a significant trend difference between TBI with ESRD patients and patients without ESRD ( p <.0001).

Relationships in the 8–12 weeks TBI condition were also highly significant, especially in layer IV ( p < 0.0001 for Basic and p = 0.0014 for Contact).

While these effects were highly significant (overall p < 0.0001), the differences in intake were small and not clinically meaningful.

A statistical analysis confirmed a highly significant difference between infected and control groups at these time points ( p < 0.0001; Figure 1 A), with a 37.6-fold increase at 48 hpi and a 136.7-fold increase at 96 hpi.

Statistical analysis confirmed that the reduction in viability at concentrations ≥ 2.50% was highly significant (**** p < 0.0001).

KM analyses revealed highly significant differences between overall survival times of the high-risk and low-risk groups (P < 0.0001) ( Figure 6 ).