Mahalanobis distances obtained by pairwise comparisons of all three genera revealed highly significant differences (permutation 10,000 rounds in MorphoJ: P < 0.0001), ranging from 4.9309 ( Lucilia and Hemipyrellia) to 11.3103 ( Chrysomya and Hemipyrellia) (Table 2 ).
Excerpts
wheat landraces Ethiopian tetraploid wheat association analysis yellow rust resistance 90 K wheat SNP array Highly significant differences were observed among accessions and accessions by environments ( P < 0.0001) in ANOVA analyses for stripe rust response in the field tests, but no significant difference was detected among environments.
The correlation between the LS-PCR results and the clinical origin (organ of isolation) of the strains was highly significant (Pearson, p < 0.0001), indicating that this PCR is a good predictor of the putative virulence of the strains.
Non-musicians showed highly significant correlations at the group level for all pulse clarity-driven ICs ( p < 0.0001) except for IC 50 ( p = 0.06), whereas musicians exhibited significant correlations only for the four highest model orders [IC 70 ( p < 0.05), IC 80 ( p < 0.01), IC 90 ( p < 0.001), and IC 100 ( p < 0.005); see Figure 6B ].
The output of this comparison shows the difference between the models to be highly significant ( Χ 2 (1) = 66.32, p < 0.0001), and the smaller AIC and BIC values and higher log likelihood of the full model also indicate the importance of mean word length as a predictor of the number of tonal contrasts ( Box 2 ).
The highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001) reinforces the reliability of this association, making it clear that this relationship is far from coincidental.
The level of education was found to be highly significant (p=.0001) with the kind of health services availed, like ANC registration, ultrasonography, Tetanus Toxoid, adopting balanced dietary pattern and use of iron and folic acid tablets.
It turns out that all profile 4 insertion sites are close to Met4-targeted genes (average distance 1.4 kb), which is highly significant comparing with random sites (p-value < 10 −4 ; Fig 4A , S5 Fig ; Methods).
The difference is highly significant, either against the null hypothesis of equal frequencies (χ 2 = 48.9529, P < 0.0001), against the expected value based on the relative number of CDSs (χ 2 = 50.3648, P < 0.0001; a slightly increased χ 2 is because E. coli has slightly fewer included CDSs than B. subtilis ), or against the expected values based on both relative number of CDSs and genomic nucleotide frequencies ( e.g. , AGAA is proportional to P A 3 P G , AGAAA to P A 4 P G , and so on, where P X is the genomic frequency of nucleotide X in either E. coli or B. subtilis ), with χ 2 = 103.07, P < 0.0001.
However, the corresponding global F ST was highly significant ( p < .0001), and its 95% confidence interval (CI) did not include 0 (0.00435–0.00828), indicating the presence of genetic structuring across the study area.
The mean gait score was 22.12 in the bipolar prosthesis group in comparison to 26.55 in the THR group and was highly significant (p value< 0.0001).
Our model results showed a highly significant interaction (χ 2 = 94.3, P < .0001) [ 27 ], confirming a difference in patterns of deferral by CD4 count and patient type.
A highly significant model (p < 0.0001) suggests its reliability.
The increase was statistically highly significant ( χ 2 analysis for trend age vs. hypertension: P < 0.0001 in both sexes).
By applying Design Expert 8.0.7.1 to fit a multiple regression to the data, the quadratic equation of Schisandra chinensis AC yield (Y) to each factor variable can be obtained as: (1) Y = 1.11 + 0.14 A + 8.3 × 10 - 3 B + 0.14 C + 0.067 A B + 0.098 A C + 0.15 B C - 0.21 A 2 - 0.16 B 2 - 0.29 C 2 The results of the regression model analysis shown in Table 7 indicate that this quadratic multinomial regression model had highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001), indicating a highly significant correlation between the three independent variables involved and the response values of AC.
In the remaining three tissues, we found weak evidence of colocalization between the GWAS and ATP11A- eQTL signals (PP4 < 0.408; Table S9 ), likely because of weakly significant eQTL p values in the locus ( p values >10 −4 ).
Comparison between before 24 weeks gestations and at 37 weeks gestations showed a highly significant decrease (p<0.0001) in fasting blood glucose level.
This study revealed a highly significant difference with a P < 0.0001 when comparing MO-CON with MO, MO-WT-mRNA and MO-R925S-mRNA.
Mean FID in the 714 populations ranged from 1 to 180 m, mean (SE) = 11.46 m (1.03; back-transformed from log 10 -transformed data), with a highly significant effect of species ( F = 3.06, df = 158, 555, R 2 = 0.47, P <0.0001).
However there was highly significant difference between different age groups in VI [p<0.0001, χ 2 (df) = 162.6(18)].
These differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Moreover, a drastic fall was observed in case of IgG4, where the difference became significant as early as on day 30 ( P = 0.0027) and was highly significant on day 365 ( P < 0.0001).
3c ) is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Bonferroni-corrected post hoc pairwise comparisons were all highly significant: 0 vs. 5 wt% (Δ = −7.12 MPa, p < 10 −4 ), 0 vs. 10 wt% (Δ = −9.99 MPa, p < 10 −4 ), and 5 vs. 10 wt% (Δ = −2.87 MPa, p < 10 −4 ).
Examining the distribution of trends from the full multimodel ensemble, the median trend lies close to the mean trend, and 68% of the multimodel realizations exhibit a positive trend, which is highly unlikely to have arisen from chance ( p < 0.0001 based on the null hypothesis of red noise; see Table 1 and Methods).