We observed highly significant positive correlations between clinical and pRF eccentricity profiles for the left (r = 0.90, P < 0.0001) and right (r = 0.86, P < 0.0001) eyes in P3.
Excerpts
Results Soil physico-chemical characteristics The electrical conductivity (EC) was higher at the 0–30 cm depth than at the 30–60 cm depth, and the differences between the EC values were highly significant (t value = 14.8913; p = 0.0001).
The regression models were both found to be highly significant (p < 0.0001), while the values for lack of fit values were not significant (p > 0.05), confirming the model fitness to produce predictions for optimal hydrolysis conditions.
The primary endpoint was highly significant with an absolute EF improvement of 18.3% in the catheter ablation arm compared to 4.4% in the medical rate control arm ( P < 0.0001).
Nevertheless, there was disagreements about which type of PD might benefit more from MAO-B inhibitors, and an extremely significant disparity ( p < 0.0001) on familiarity with the use of disease-modifying/neuroprotective therapy (χ 2 ( N = 711) = 42.9005, p < 0.0001), Rivastigmine for PDD patients (χ 2 ( N = 711) = 20.2759, p < 0.0001), and antipsychotics for psychiatric symptoms managements (χ 2 ( N = 711) = 21.8987, p < 0.0001).
Breeding system Pollination treatments had a highly significant effect on fruit set in all five treatments ( F 4,10 = 31.6, P < 0.0001, ANOVA).
Correlation of depression as per BDI with Self-esteem (RSES) and body image disturbances (BICI) A highly significant negative correlation of depression with self-esteem ( r = -0.678, P < 0.0001) and a highly significant positive correlation ( r = 0.6395, P < 0.0001) with body image disturbances was seen in our sample of CD [ Table 5 ].
Although these increases were highly significant (ANOVA: F 25,429 = 1434, p < 0.0001; F 13,95 = 13.64, p < 0.0001), they were really small (see Supporting Information Tables S4 and S5 ) in units of percent (females vs. males) both in WT and KO animals. 3.3.
Both terms were again highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for both), but together only explained 13% of the variation in AAA.
Highly significant statistical differences were observed between the K β values of cholesterol-enriched and control samples (p < 0.0001), mimicking the trends observed with the exponent β.
These differences were confirmed by ANOVA, in which F values for genotypic differences were highly significant ( P = 0.0001; Table 2 ) and coefficient of variation (CV) ranged from 16.5 to 28.6% for parental genotypes and from 40.0 to 83.7% for the RILs.
We found highly significant positive correlations ( r > 0.91, p < 0.0001, n = 324) between the fragment intensities of all samples and only very minor and non-significant deviations from a slope of one, with Δsl ranging from 0.008 (NADW/EMW) to up to 0.243 (Lake/AABW) (Fig. 2 ).
While subsets of the neuronal population showed increases or decreases in activity, the overall population showed a 26% increase in mean firing rate, which was highly significant with t -test p < 0.0001 ( Figure 4f ).
The protection provided by the cocktail was highly significant when compared to individual mAbs m8C4 or FVM09 or control (p < 0.0001).
The difference in the number and distribution of lesions in rAAV2/2[MAX]smCBA-Eylea and PBS control groups was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Chi Square test), strongly indicating that rAAV-mediated over-expression of an anti-VEGF agent is able to prevent disease pathology in AMD (Fig. 5H ).
3.2 Seed germination trials Overall, the comparisons of the seed germination between the treatments and experimental control were highly significant ( F (3, 1316) = 7.6; p < .0001; Figure 4 ).
However, for self-injurious behaviour, there was a much stronger SES gradient for the 7–11 age group, with only a slight trend apparent for the 12–17 age group (χ 2 = 27.01, p -value < 0.0001, Figure 4 B).
Pairwise comparison between groups at each time revealed that all the test compounds induced a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) reduction in BGL comparable with the standard drug rosiglitazone.
As shown in Fig 1A and 1B , a highly significant effect (p < 0.0001) was found in different PL concentration ranges tested in MM-231 and MM-468 cells.
However, there was a highly significant interaction between temperature and drought strategy ( F 1,124 = 41.77, P ≤ 0.0001), indicating that these groups of species responded to the experimental heat treatments differently.
A highly significant level of concordance was observed between qPCR and ddPCR (r = 0.94, P <0.0001; 95% CI, 0.94–0.97), with 189 of 222 samples (85.1%) fully concordant.
The statistical differences were highly significant (Chi-Square test: p < 0.0001, Fisher’s exact test: p < 0.0001, OR = 1.56, 95%CI: 1.278 to 1.904).
Highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were found among thermal oxidation times across the 0.5–2.5 THz range.
On comparing PACS score at discharge and follow-up between relapsed and nonrelapsed groups, the difference was highly significant at both time points ( t = 4.15, P < 0.0001 and t = 4.01, P < 0.0001, respectively).
Two-way ANOVA analyses proved that the cortisol treatments affect male and female cell responses differently; the interaction was considered extremely significant (interaction p value < 0.0001; F = 392.7; DFn = 2).