Furthermore, the combination of KMP01D and vitamin D3 mitigated CD14 gene expression in patient-derived PBMCs which was shown to be highly significant in UICC stages I–III ( p < 0.0001; Figure 3A ).
Excerpts
0.0000 webs m −2 ) was statistically highly significant (Mann–Whitney U test, n 1 = 18, n 2 = 20, Z = −4.0637, p < 0.0001).
These results showcased a decreased occurrence and were highly significant (p<0.0001) ( Figure 1 ).
This was a highly significant association ( P < 0.0001).
The differences between categories were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) for all pairwise comparisons applying Mann-Whitney tests with Bonferroni correction. 101,693 regions of up to 30 kb in length were annotated as repetitive sequences (9.14%).
24 ppm), and was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The GWAS analysis revealed a total of 80 highly significant Bonferroni corrected SNPs ( p < 0.0001 (−log10 ( p ) = 9.45) located on eight autosomes ( Table S1 ).
In both groups of workers, there was a highly significant difference in urinary cx-MiOP resulting from those in the control group (in both cases p < 0.0001).
There was a highly significant interaction between mulch and the amaranth varieties in 2017 (F = 7.24, df = 8, 32; p < 0.0001) as well as in 2018 (F = 7.44, df = 8, 32; p < 0.0001).
The difference between Groups B vs C: D: E were statistically highly significant (p value < 0.0001;<0.0001; <0.001).
The quadratic model was highly significant, with a very high model F -value (69.42) and a very low p -value ( p < 0.0001).
HRV during Euthanasia Highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001, Friedman tests) in HF, LF and LF/HF ratio were found between time periods ( Table 1 ).
The seminal fluid concentrations of Pb (SfPb) and Cd (SfCd) were measured in 118 of the 149 subjects, and a highly significant (p < 0.0001) correlation was found between BPb and SfPb levels (r = 0.571) and between BCd and SfCd levels (r = 0.490).
One study performed DTI on the median nerve in subjects with carpal tunnel syndrome and compared with control subjects and showed that the measured parameters in DTI show a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) [ 43 ].
Analysis of the two tracking sets showed that compared to sporozoites gliding independently of CD31-labeled vessels, the average apparent speed of gliding sporozoites decreases once they approach a blood vessel from 1.38 μm/s to 1.06 μm/s, and this difference is highly significant (p value < 0.0001) ( Figure 2B ).
There was a large and highly significant (p < 0.0001) increase in IL-8 mRNA at 2 h in response to TNFα in both control and PAH endothelial cells.
Controlling for CPI and exchange rate, the mean difference between stage 1 and stage 2 is 14 503 ( = β ˆ 3 − β ˆ 4 ) , which is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating a drastic drop of Hong Kong tourists after the attack of SARS.
Despite this observed variability between immune responses at 7 days p.i., the difference in proliferative responses to viral and myelin antigens in infected and control groups was highly significant ( p <0.0001).
In contrast, a highly significant difference in IgG2a response (Th-1) was observed in the sera of mice vaccinated with both Ad5.MERS-S and Ad5.MERS-S1 (**** P < 0.0001 at weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) ( Fig. 3 B).
In the statistical analysis of the number of survivors, a highly significant effect was found (Omnibus test: likelihood ratio chi-squared test = 112.414, d.f. = 1, p < 0.0001).
Fisher's exact test ( http://www.langsrud.com/fisher.htm ) revealed a highly significant accumulation of stop codons in the 3c sequence of FIPVs compared to FECVs (p < 0.0001). 4.
A decline in CFU was seen sequentially with increasing passage number ( Figure 4(d) ); comparison of CFU at p1 and p3, p3 and p5, and p1 and p5 was performed using Wilcoxon matched-pairs t - test and the difference was highly significant for each analysis ( p < 0.0001).
The comparison of pre- versus post-flight values revealed that bodyweight increased in the flight group (8%, p = 0.0010), ground control (4%, p = 0.0456) and control vivarium groups (11%, p<0.0001) with overall effect of “time” being highly significant (F(1,104) = 59.79, p<0.0001).
Whereas correlations of PPAS-6 and PPAS-3 scores with job control at the within-subgroup level (r within ) were highly significant (p < .0001) according to both the R statistic and t-test, such correlations at the between-subgroup level (r between ) were not significant (p>.05). “ S2 Table ” in the supplement/appendix outlines the key indices of within-subgroup variability and interrater agreement in PPAS-6 and PPAS-3 scores among the same validation population subgroups used to assess factor invariance.
Extremely significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were demonstrated by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test between the concentrations of 0–1.95 μg/mL ( Figure 4 A).