Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

nominally significantp = 1.0E−040.0× alphagold
Pathway analyses conducted on nominally significant targets showed that genes associated with BD and BMI were enriched for the Neuronal cell body Gene Ontology (GO) term ( p = 1.0E−04; false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.025) and different pathways, including the Signaling by Hedgehog pathway ( p = 4.8E−05, FDR = 0.02), while genes associated with BD and T2D showed no specific enrichment.
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Chi square values for the independence between genotypes of RM136 and days to heading (early and late heading divided by the dotted line in Figure 1 ) were 26.880, 81.073, and 86.693 for Jpn1, Jpn2, and W1297, respectively, all highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Firstly, the gesture-only conditions (blurred, pointing, give-me gestures) were statistically investigated in a 2-way ANOVA (Time window × Gesture type) calculated across the three time windows, which revealed a highly significant interaction (F(4, 96) = 8.47, ε = 0.66, p = 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.26).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Mortality analysis ( Figure 2 ) Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly lower all-cause mortality in the HIF group compared to the ESA group, with a highly significant log-rank test ( p < 0.0001), indicating improved survival among HIF users.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
lar region, maximum temperature in the ocular region, standard deviation of temperature in the digital flexor tendons of the hind limb, standard deviation of temperature in the tarsus region, maximum temperature in the thorax, and average temperature in the coronary region of the thoracic limb made highly significant contributions ( p < 0.0001) to the discriminant functions when qualitative gait evaluation levels were the clustering criteria.
highly significantP =0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Cox multivariate regression model (IS and TNM staging) showed that IS has a highly significant correlation with OS (HR: 2.70; P =0.0001) and DFS (HR: 2.10; P =0.0008) compared to TNM staging system (HR: 1.92; P =0.057 for OS and HR: 1.95; P =0.039 for DFS) ( Table 4 ).