Excerpts

For total medication count, both the overall association and the nonlinear component were highly significant (both p < 0.0001) (Figure 1A ).

Additionally, the relation between serum IgG SRID and serum TP Refractometry was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.82).

crenata seeds interacting in close proximity with bitter vetch roots showed low germination rates (average 2.90% ± standard error of the mean 0.13), ranging from 0.06% ± 0.04 to 5.66% ± 0.79 as a maximum with a highly significant genotypic effect ( p < 0.0001).

Here, the two-factorial interactions between salt stress and duration of treatment and between salt stress and grafting were significant and marginally significant, respectively ( p = 0.0001, p = 0.0559).

The highly significant differences between cord blood and maternal peripheral blood ( p < 0.0001) were also preserved upon subdivision according to maternal allergy status (see Figure 2 c,d and Supplementary Figure S4b for total Treg, iTreg and nTreg, respectively) as well as according to the sex of the newborns (see Figure 2 e,f and Supplementary Figure S4c for total Treg, iTreg and nTreg, respectively). 3.3.

Variance in signed FA (δ 2 FA =0.4066) was more than tenfold larger than variance in ME (δ 2 ME =0.03085) and was highly significant (likelihood-ratio test: P <0.0001).

This relationship was highly significant ( r = 0.39, p < 0.0001).

We find a highly significant correlation between p53 protein synthesis in leukemic blast cells and the secondary plating efficiency of these cells (p = 0.0001).

Differences in TRBV usage was highly significant between cohorts showing 77% of total variation by two-way ANOVA ( p ≤ 0.0001) ( Figure 2 A).

The diagnostic powers of C1M, C3M, C5M and C6M were highly significant with an AUROC > 85% ( P < 0.0001).

An additional indication that the cluster analysis was rather successful is that, despite the high (.49-.68) pairwise correlations of the three EMP data set variables, except for the first two clusters (CLE1 and CLE2) the Bartlett test of overall independence was not significant or just marginally significant, whereas in the total sample the test was highly significant ( p < .0001).

This difference was highly significant (p < 10 −4 , Kolmogorov–Smirnov test).

This was confirmed via a 2-way permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) analysis which identified a highly significant effect on diversity between adult, tadpole and water samples (F = 10.71; df = 2; p = 0.0001), a significant effect due to the housing conditions (F = 2.84; df = 1; p = 0.0056), but also a significant interaction effect due to the fact that diversity in tadpoles differs significantly between clean and standard conditions whilst it remains consistent in adults (F = 2.69; df = 2; p = 0.0011).

This difference was highly significant (p<0.0001).

Area under the curve (AUC) of the HFA, TIMI RS and Goldman tools for the endpoint of MACE was 0.54, 0.71 and 0.67, respectively, with the difference between the tools in predictive ability for MACE being highly significant [chi 2 (3) = 67.21, N = 276, p < 0.0001].

Highly significant IOV was demonstrated for CT based contouring of the tumour bed (p < 0.0001), while agreement was high for the MRI-based approach.

And when we combined information across all colonies, we found highly significant evidence of caste‐biased paternity skew ( P < 0.0001).

Note that the surprise fixed effect was already highly significant in the null model ( t (1043.0) = 8.72, p < .0001).

Across the 17 clones, there was a highly significant correlation between the levels of E7 and total E6 transcripts per cell ( p < 0.0001) (Figure 2C ).

It contains almost all of the sites where pathogenic substitutions occur in TnI, a highly significant result (P < 0.0001).

Each effect on pain (NPS and vmPFC controlling for NAc) was highly significant when controlling for the other, but the NPS effects on pain ratings (standardized = 15.67, t 32 = 9.65, p <0.0001) were approximately three times larger than the effects of the vmPFC (standardized = −5.54, t 32 = −5.29, p <0.0001).

We observed a highly significant correlation between genetic (Fst) and geographical distances (Mantel’s test, P-value < 0.0001, S3 Fig ) between populations (sites) of B. tabaci SSA1 SG1 U SG2 (this Mantel test was not performed on B. tabaci SG3 or SSA2 ∪ SSA3 due to low sample sizes).

A highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) was observed between the 2:1 treatment, and both 1:1 and PFOA only treatments, with respect to lethal concentration and apparent neurobehavioral effects, suggesting an effectively reduced toxicity of the fully complexed PFOA.

Furthermore, we found a highly significant, negative correlation between PBR values and RBC filling (Person r = − 0.87, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2 c).

Thus, as on Day 0, there was a highly significant (p < .0001) effect of time of day on each day (1–11) with elevated levels occurring at the same ZT times as on pre-shift Day 0.