Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
1 Y = - 99.560 + 39.480 x 1 + 81.593 x 2 + 62.304 x 3 + 9.735 x 4 - 1.300 x 1 x 2 + 1.125 x 1 x 3 - 0.275 x 1 x 4 + 8.250 x 2 x 3 - 2.154 ∗ 10 14 x 2 x 4 + 1.656 x 3 x 4 - 12.393 x 1 2 - 56.173 x 2 2 - 67.927 x 3 2 - 0.873 x 4 2 The quadratic model for the ANOVA was highly significant (p < 0.0001), suggesting that the model for the regression terms was adequate, and that a higher order model would not be needed.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This confirmed modest though highly significant associations between circulating syndecan-1 and birthweight at 36 weeks’ (cohort 1; p < 0.0001; R 2 = 0.02, Supplementary Figure 1 E), and on the day of delivery in both the Melbourne (cohort 3; p < 0.0001 R 2 = 0.06, Supplementary Figure 1 F) and Chile cohorts (cohort 4; p = 0.0008, R 2 = 0.03, Supplementary Figure 1 G).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Evaluation by the Fischer’s exact test revealed that only the affected (n = 12) and not the unaffected twins (n = 0) had autoantibodies against the systemic autoantigen targets, and this difference was highly significant (P < 0.0001).
highly significantp-value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results: In the present study, total 110 study subjects responded by completely filling out the questionnaire The total calorie and protein intake of the study subjects before and after giving intervention for three months was found to be highly significant (p-value < 0.0001).
a decreasing trendP < 0.00010.0× alphagold
The incidence rate showed a rapidly increasing trend from 1975 to 1987, with an APC of 3.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8–3.9%, P < 0.0001), while this increase slowed from 1988 to 2001 (APC = 0.8%, 95% CI = 0.4–1.1%, P < 0.0001), and was followed by a decreasing trend from 2002 to 2016 (APC= −0.7%, 95% CI= −0.9% to −0.5%, P < 0.0001).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Performing Chi-square tests ( Table 7 ), we find that uric acid has a highly significant relation with gender ( P < 0.0001), but it does not show statistically significant relation with age ( P = 0.684), height ( P = 0.051), weight ( P = 0.996), diet ( P = 0.904), and residential inhabitant ( P = 0.551). 4.