Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The likelihood of undergoing resection has been shown to decrease with increasing age, with patients of age group 65–69 years having a 71% resection rate compared with 69% for those aged 70–74 years, 62% for those aged 80–84 years, 46% for those aged 80–84 years, and 31% for those aged 85 years and older, which was highly significant ( P <0.0001) even after adjusting for confounding factors. 3 This same trend was repeated almost identically for receipt of RT within 3 months of diagnosis or receipt of chemotherapy within 3 months of diagnosis, when analyzed according to increasing age, in the same US population-based report, 3 a
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Similarly, the percentages of antigen-experienced CD4 + T cells subsets that could be identified as specific CD4 T cell subsets in AIT-treated asthmatic mice showed highly significant increases in T H 1 ( p < 0.0001) and T H 17 ( p < 0.01) cells, while decreases were noted for antigen-experienced CD4 + T H 2 ( p < 0.0001) and Treg cells ( p < 0.0001) compared to the asthmatic mice ( Figure S5-c ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Longitudinal tumor growth data, analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with restricted maximum likelihood, revealed highly significant effects for both the time × group interaction [ p < 0.0001, F(5.514, 32.81) = 11.36] and the group main effect [ p < 0.0001, F(5, 119) = 41.56] ( Figure 2e ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As expected, only very minor differences were noted between the antibodies with and without LS (Table 1 , Suppl Table S1 A,B), with highly significant correlation between values: for each pair of antibodies, both IC50 values and IC80 values correlated with Spearman’s rho of 0.94 or higher and p < 0.0001; and the median IC50s were no more than twofold different, which is within experimental error for this assay 17 .
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Changes in overall cell growth did not reach significance after ADAM10 single knockdown ( Figure 4 a,b) being, however, highly significant after ADAM17 knockdown ( p = 0.0001; Figure 4 c,d) and to a lesser extend also following ADAM10/17 double knockdown ( p = 0.0012 and p = 0.0027; Figure 4 e,f).
highly significantp < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, comparing adherence trends in the subsamples with comorbid ADHD (n = 117) and without ADHD (n = 62) showed that the association between younger age and poor adherence was highly significant in the subsample with ADHD (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.45-0.73, p < .0001) and nonsignificant in the subsample without ADHD (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.80-1.47, p = .6).