The multivariate Hotelling’s T 2 test using these shape parameters indicated highly significant differences in group means between the control vs. paroxysmal groups ( P < 0.0001), the control vs. persistent groups ( P < 0.0001), and the paroxysmal vs. persistent groups ( P < 0.001).
Excerpts
The results in Table 7 demonstrate a highly significant difference among algorithms ( P <0.0001), substantiating the robustness of bDTOPRS in feature selection.
However, using Spearman’s correlation analysis, a highly significant (P < 0.0001) moderate to strong positive correlation (r = 0.42 – 0.64) was detected between the five P. copri strains ( Figure 3B ).
When it comes to lRFS the Rome classification showed highly significant predictive value (p<0.0001 both at Log-Rank and Wilcoxon) with a notable progressively lower local control for each increasing T stage.
Although modest, the aPTT increase remained highly significant when comparing T0 and T4 at residual concentrations ( P < 0.0001 for both drugs).
Bulb firmness The analysis of variance revealed that the main effects of variety, storage duration and preharvest treatment were highly significant ( P < 0.0001 ) on bulb firmness.
The model for reaction force was highly significant ( F ‐value: 3745.70, p ‐value <0.0001).
The Spearman’s rho test showed a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47–0.72, P < 0.0001); the bias between the two determinations (Bland–Altman test) was −0.33 (95% CI, −12.8–12.1; Supplemental Fig. 1 ).
This response rate to peptide 4 was highly significant, with p < 0.0001.
According to t test, differences between the analyzed genotypes were highly significant ( p <0.0001).
In Table 3 , regular alcohol consumption by the spouse was found to have a highly significant association with both psychological violence (p = 0.0001) and physical violence (p = 0.0008).
The impact of the respondents' perception of local professional norms regarding disclosure on their attitudes and behaviours was substantially highly significant (p<0.0001) and, importantly, it was independent of local culture.
In the moderator test, the estimated model was highly significant with QM ( df = 4) = 41.21 and p < 0.0001.
According to Chi-squared tests in Table 2 and Table 3 , the preference patterns for male and female doctors were all highly significant difference from an equal choice among the various dress styles (p-value<0.0001).
The micrometry in terms of number of neurons per unit area in various regions shows most highly significant decline (p < 0.0001) in F and BF group in the Diencephalon, Optic Lobe (OL) and Cerebellum regions than that of the Vg (See Table 3 ). 4 Discussion Neuro-developmental toxicology is rather a new branch of toxicology where the brain and nervous system’s development is studied under the influence of commonly found environmental toxins [31] , [32] , [33] .
Statistical analysis confirmed that the mechanical parameters of the pull-off test of the coatings were statistically highly significant for all samples ( p < 0.0001).
As displayed in Figure 9(c) , the plotted KM curve illustrated extremely significant differences ( P < 0.0001), of these, 269 and 270 samples were classified into the high- and low-risk groupings, respectively. 3.8.
All these effects were highly significant (p < 0.0001).
Comparing the mean amplitude in the last 500 ms preceding stimulus onset in a central region of interest (ROI) yielded a highly significant difference ( t (12) = -6.233, p < 10 -4 ).
Association of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity with CBR3 V244M genotype status We compared left ventricular systolic function from pre- and post-DOX treatment echocardiograms in each CBR3 V244M genotype group and found a highly significant effect of DOX treatment on left ventricular systolic function (F[1,89] = 50.33, p < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA).
All of the comparisons yielded highly significant ( P < 10 −4 ) differences, with MutExMatSorting-arranged BMs showing significantly larger scores than MEMo-arranged BMs.
Moreover, the results of ANOVA are shown in Tables S3–S6 as the evaluation of the predicted models, which revealed that the models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001 for all), indicating that the models showed a good fit with our experimental data.
However, terms for IL2 in addition to IL2×CSF2 produced highly significant models with coefficient p-values<1e-4.
The post hoc Tukey’s test shown in Figure 5 provides strong statistical evidence for this cytotoxic effect, particularly at 100 μg/mL, which showed highly significant reductions in cell viability ( p < 0.0001).
Our sample size justification is supported by prior work [ 25 ], which identified 57 differentially expressed ncRNAs in the hippocampus of stressed rats, with several showing highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) using only 7–8 animals per group.