Excerpts

The quadratic model was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with an F -value of 38.91.

The model turned out to be highly significant at the permutation test ( p < 10 −4 ), as shown in Figure 9C , and predictive with 100% correct classification rate. 4 Discussion In the present study, the longitudinal multi-omics investigation on a single mother-infant dyad was proposed to examine in depth the relationships among diet composition, gut microbiota metabolism and composition during the transition from breastfeeding to weaning.

However, purge loss in cured pork sausages was highly significant with the addition of ligands ( p < 0.0001; Table 2 ), with cysteine treatment showing higher purge loss than histidine and nicotinamide treatments ( p < 0.05; Table 3 ).

We observed a positive trend toward increasing VO 2 ( P < 0.0001) and CO ( P = 0.20) with BMI by iFick formulae and thermodilution.

The conclusion about the difference in the richness of ground cover species under the different tree dominant canopies remains highly significant (P < 0.0001) for any block size (5 × 5, 10 × 10, or 20 × 20 m) in an ANOVA with mixed effects regarding the spatial connectivity of plots.

The ANOVA revealed that the model was highly significant due to the low probability value ( p < 0.0001).

Statistical differences were determinated through the one-way analysis of variance procedure followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, comparing results between mock control and treated cells, Differences were statistically significant when p < 0.05 (*) (#) and highly significant when p < 0.0001 (**) (##) versus each respective mock control or untreated control group. 3.

The a priori defined primary pharmacodynamic outcome of an increase in the frequency of Tregs as a percentage of CD4 + T-lymphocytes at D8 was dose-dependent (JT-J test, p < 0.0001) and highly significant for both treated arms (MW-U test, p < 0·0001; 2 MIU: mean [SD]: +6·2% [2·2]; 1 MIU: mean [SD]: +3·9% [1·2]) as compared to placebo (mean [SD]: −0·5% [1·3]) (see Table 3 , Fig. 2 a and b).

The linear correlation between estimated and measured glycemia was highly significant (r = 0.68; p = 0.0001) in the trained group and not significant in controls (r = -0.12; p = 0.32).

All three responses demonstrate predictive capability with R 2 values ranging from 0.8418 to 0.9576 with a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.0001).

decipiens , these differences were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) (see Data Set S1 at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5315135.v1 ).

Statistical analysis confirmed that this is a highly significant effect (Binomial p -value < 0.0001, Table A in S1 Text ) for each racial category (Asian, Black, White, and Hispanic).

Notably, the difference in the EC50 values of both TNBC cell lines, when compared to EC50 values of MCF-10 cells, was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Activity Against Enterococci Directly after adding 50μg/ml IL-26 to Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 cultures, an immediate and highly significant ( p ≤0.0001) reduction of the number of colony forming units (CFU) of approximately 98.4% was detected.

The chi-square test revealed a highly significant association (χ 2 = 121.85, p < 0.0001) between the period (flowering scarcity vs. flowering onset) and the eversion of the copulatory apparatus.

Adhesion Protocol Comparisons In comparisons of different adhesion protocol groups for each RBC, there were highly significant differences between and among groups for all RBCs: FOBF ( F =266.87, P <0.0001), TNCBF ( F =173.16, P <0.0001), and Z350XT ( F =103.64, P <0.0001).

A one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of formulation on swelling (S w ) (F(7, 792) ≈ 43,176, p < 0.0001), with a very large effect size (η2 ≈ 0.997).

These differences were highly significant (p < 0.0001).

The following P values were used in the study for the significance: *, P < 0.05 was considered significant; **, P < 0.001 was considered highly significant; and ***, P < 0.0001 was considered very highly significant.

A linear mixed model analysis comparing the pretreatment radial progression rate (137μm/yr, SE 11.41) to the post-treatment progression rate reduction (64 μm/yr, SE 11.89) found the reduction of ARGA progression following panmacular SDM to be highly significant (p<0.0001).

The slope coefficient (0.2974) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), reinforcing the conclusion that a strong linear relationship exists between initial and later tumor volumes.

Compared with the wild bacteria control group, negative blank control group, and PBS control group, the positive control group stimulated by LPS or 2′, 3′-cGAMP has differences extremely significant ( P < 0.0001; Fig. 2 A); the recombinant β-defensin rAvBD1-2–6-13 was also extremely significantly higher than the wild bacteria control group, negative blank control group, and PBS control group ( P < 0.0001; Fig. 2 A).

putrida , P -value < 0.0001; all pairwise tests with element E were highly significant with a P -value < 0.0001, while no other pairs had P < 0.01).

Substitution saturation is marginally significant for the SKL1 family (p = 0.07) and highly significant for the SK family (p<0.0001).

A highly significant correlation between GPR and FOXP3 was observed for both GPR ( Figures 4A, B , p<0.0001).