Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 6.69×10 −50.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We therefore re-analyzed the genome-wide expression profiles (Gene Expression Omnibus accession number GSE21260 ) of several different uninfected KC cultures and hrHPV+ KC cultures reported previously [10] by Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) and found a highly significant enrichment of genes belonging to the protein ubiquitination pathway ( Table S1 ; p = 6.69×10 −5 ).
highly significantp = 6.7∙10 −50.0× alphaqualifiedgold
At the group level, the ΔPSEs were highly significant for the ASD group (red bar, Figure 2B ; t 17 = 5.2, p = 6.7∙10 −5 , Cohen’s d = 1.23, 95% CI = [0.6, 1.84], t -test), and smaller, but still (albeit marginally) significant for the control group (blue bar, Figure 2B ; t 19 = 2.1, p = 0.047 Cohen’s d = 0.47, 95% CI = [0.006, 0.93], t -test).
nominally significantp<6.7×10 −50.0× alphagold
Some of the CpG sites with nominally significant (p<6.7×10 −5 ) differences in methylation between HA and LA are close to genes that are differentially expressed in response to hypoxia; these genes include: toll-like receptor 6 ( TLR6) [57] , mif two 3 homolog 1 ( SUMO1) [27] ; phosphodiesterase 4A ( PDE4A) [58] and human immunodeficiency virus type I enhancer binding protein 2 ( HIVEP2 ) [42] .
highly significantp< 6.93e-050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In particular, the top nine pathways (most highly significant (p< 6.93e-05) were: microRNAs in cancer (hsa05206), endocrine resistance in cancer (hsa01522), EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance (hsa01521), FoxO signalling pathway (hsa04068), hepatitis B (hsa05161), pathways in cancer (hsa05200), proteoglycans in cancer (hsa05205), breast cancer (hsa05224) and human papillomavirus infection (hsa05165).
highly significantp = 0.000070.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation between PD and PDR performance We found a highly significant, positive correlation (Spearman's rank correlation, r = 0.72, p = 0.00007) between the individual performances in the PD and PDR tasks, i.e. subjects that needed a high number of trials to reach the criterion in the visual discrimination task also needed a high number of trials to reach the criteri
extremely significantP = 0.000070.0× alphaqualified
An extremely significant increase was detected throughout the day’s 14 ( P = 0.00007, 0.0001, and 0.0008) and day’s 28 ( P = 0.000, 0.000, and 0.0001) of period studied in all present treated groups (Pro 4, Pro 7 and mixture of Pro 4 and Pro 7 strains respectively) compared to untreated group.
highly significantP = 0.000070.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As an illustration, taking a case with 5 TDLU with negative staining, 5 of sporadic pattern at intensity 2, 5 of sporadic pattern at intensity 3 and 10 with a 'ring-like' pattern at intensity 1 results in a score of 20 x 0 + 20(2 + 1 + 1) + 20(3 + 1 + 1) + 40(1 + 2 + 1) = 340 Twenty-five cases were examined independently by two observers and the scores obtained showed a significant con- cordance (t = 0.723, P = 0.00003, Kendall Rank Correlation). Intraobserver correlation was also highly significant (T = 0.96, P = 0.00007).
nominally significantP < 7E-050.0× alphagold
A 2-tailed P < 0.05 for validation tests with FG and FI was considered nominally significant, and after the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, P < 7E-05 for FG and P < 5E-04 for FI were considered statistically significant.