3.2 Response to ETI therapy initiation Effects of ETI therapy assessed with averaged CFAbd-day2day © responses revealed a highly significant decrease in the median total score ( p = 0.00001).
Excerpts
In particular, the differences are highly significant on branch #1 and branch #2 during the genome reduction period (Student's t-test, P- value<10 −5 ).
In fact, performing an even split of all subjects, regardless of the diagnosis, using the PDI of the corpus callosum demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation between PDI and FA (r 2 = .48, p < 10 − 5 ) in the bottom half.
Among transcript and protein levels, genes that varied most across strains were involved in aerobic respiration and the electron transport chain, with highly significant gene ontology enrichment ( P < 10 −5 ) for cellular respiration, ATP synthesis coupled proton transport, and mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes (Supplemental Table 4).
The power of the TCI to predict the membership of individuals in a particular rsFC group (i.e., squared multiple regression R 2 ) was strong and highly significant for group 1 (R 2 = 52%, F = 79.42, p < 1E−5, RMSE 0.11), group 3 (R 2 = 67%, F = 142.9, p < 1E−5, RMSE = 0.07), group 4 (R 2 = 35%, f = 51.2, p < 1E−5, RMSE 0.17), and group 5 (R 2 = 46%, F = 7 l.9, p < 1E−5, RMSE 0.14).
Moreover, fixation index ( F ST = 0.098) was highly significant ( P < 10 -5 ) as indicated by permutation test.
Results The values of LV-EDV and LV-ESV measured in 3D-ECHO showed highly significant correlations with CMR (for LV-EDV r = 0.892, p < 0.00001; for LV-ESV r = 0.896, p < 0.00001).
Furthermore, a robust association between observed and predicted responses for TC degradation was evident from the highly significant regression model (p-value < 0.00001), high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.9886), and well-adjusted R2 value (0.9780) 18 , 59 .
Both values are very large and highly significant (p<0.00001) compared to chance levels (1/49 or about 2%, dashed line, which corresponds to the average, 49.2 (SD 2.3) cards presented in each riffle, which is slightly less than the total number of cards -52).
For example, the differences in −6 nucleotide frequencies between our data set and the reference panel were highly significant (p<0.00001), yet the preference for guanine did not change; rather, the strength of the preference increased while the use of thymine at this position decreased in our refined panel.
Considering all pairs of individuals, the regression slope b ± SE = 0.0097 ± 0.0018 was highly significant ( P < 0.00001).
We found a highly significant ( P <1e−5 through a permutation test) correlation between model predictions and high-throughput data ( Figure 4B ; see Supplementary information ).
The difference between hPL and PPP arms was found to be statistically highly significant in favour of hPL arm with P < 0.00001.
This difference was found to be highly significant (OR=5.55, 95% CI 3.47 to 7.65, p < 0.00001), as shown in Figure 5 .
After correcting for age at recruitment, population structure, and study site, we identified 266 moderately significant associations, 51 of which were independent ( p < 10 −5 , r 2 < 0.2).
The combined group demonstrated a substantially larger and highly significant positive effect (SMD = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.83 to 2.21; P < 0.00001).
The discriminant validity was demonstrated by highly significant differences ( p < 0.00001) between the treatment groups across multiple timepoints, with a strong effect size at three months.
Additionally, infertility showed a clear trend of increasing prevalence with rising BMI, reaching 38.5% in patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ( p = 0.00001) ( Table 3 ).
The detected linkage disequilibrium was highly significant in both cases (P<10 −5 ).
This revealed a total of 52 out of 176 neurofeedback runs that achieved high regulation (~30%; median per participant: 2; MAD: 1.7; range: 0–6), which was highly significant according to binomial testing ( P < 0.00001) (Fig. 2C ).
However, the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity between the two data is highly significant, using the two-sided t -test with p-value <10 −5 .
The overall effect was highly significant (Z = 12.27, p < 0.00001), supporting the robust efficacy of the treatment in reducing the uterine size ( Figure 5 ).
The 2 mg dosage also showed a highly significant effect ( p < 0.00001, I 2 = 12%), with low heterogeneity.
The FLA demonstrated the shortest mean duration (10.88 ± 1.2 min), with a highly significant difference (analysis of variance F-test, P < 0.00001) compared to the eyebrow, bifrontal trans-basal, and pterional approaches.
The pooled results demonstrated a robust and highly significant survival benefit in patients diagnosed under Sepsis-3 criteria (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.39–0.57, P < 0.00001) ( Figure 6A ) and Sepsis-1/2 (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41–0.90, P = 0.0008) ( Figure 6C ).