This difference was highly significant (Mann–Whitney U test, P < 10 −5 ).
Excerpts
The cumulative occupational exposure Occup_PAHs was highly significant ( p = 0.00001) in coke-oven workers compared to control subjects, for whom it was always zero, as well as the urinary excretion of 1-pyrenol ( p = 0.00001).
There was a strong positive correlation between DAO and histamine levels in all the groups that was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.00001) (Table 6 ).
Results Nadi Shodhana Pranayama showed a significant decrease in ART (p = 0.01) and Bhramari Pranayama showed a highly significant decrease in ART (p < 0.00001).
Also, the random effect of study was highly significant for the half‐life analysis ( p < 0.00001), but there was no significant random effect of study for the percent recalcitrance model ( p = 1).
Overall, there is a highly significant effect of training week across the balance beam crossing time data [ F (18 , 4914) = 5.1, p < 0.00001].
Only electrodes with a highly significant correlation relative to the null were retained ( P < 10 −5 ).
The difference was highly significant (p < 0.00001).
A test for subgroup differences revealed a highly significant difference between the SLT and DLT subgroups (Chi 2 = 749.98, p < 0.00001), further supporting the idea that the effects of thermal softening may differ based on tube type.
The difference in the number of genes identified by KC-RBM and the second-best method, NGM, is highly significant ( P < 10 −5 , based on a permutation approach).
RXC software (Miller 1997 ) demonstrated a highly significant difference in the distribution of haplotypes between taurines and indicines ( P = 0.000010 ± 0.000001, Metropolis algorithm).
A relatively small number of the correlations were strong ( R > 0.4) and highly significant ( p < 1e−5 and FDR < 0.016) (Fig. 4 a).
Univariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of edema and the volume of filler administered was highly significant ( P < 0.00001, Fig. 5 A).
Group differences were highly significant at the overall p = 0.00001 level.
This difference is statistically highly significant (p < 0.00001, χ 2 -test, confidence interval: p < 0.05).
The results indicate a nonsignificant trend toward left-sided tinnitus ( P = .07) and a highly significant association between ear-piece location and tinnitus location ( P < .00001).
The log 10 Bayes factors recovered under each substitution model exhibit very highly significant linear relationships ( r 2 > 0.99, p < 0.00001 in all cases) and are hence independent of the amino acid substitution model employed (electronic supplementary material, S7).
At the population level, mean accuracy averaged over all participants and stimulus sets (including different word sets and continuous sentences from different speakers) was highly significant (mean accuracy r = 0.28, p <10 −5 , one-sample t test, df = 14).
The combined effect for these inter-correlations was highly significant [Friedman ANOVA Chi Square ( N = 36, df = 2) = 72.00; p < 0.00001; Kendall Coeff. of Concordance = 1.0000 Aver. rank r = 1.0000].
The positive relationship between φ and geographical distance was statistically highly significant (Mantel test, 100000 randomisations, r = 0.375, P = 0.00001), also when corrected for beetle phenotype (Partial Mantel test, 100000 randomisations, r = 0.379, P = 0.00001; see Materials and Methods for comments regarding the value of r of the Mantel test).
The test for overall effect was highly significant (Z = 7.99, p < 0.00001), confirming the beneficial impact of the interventions on PFS.
Marginally significant associations (p < 1 × 10 −5 ) are reported in Table S2 .
Two other groups that are characterized by significant differences from all the other groups are the populations from the North Caucasus (Dargins, Avars, and Lezgins), the Bashkirs, and the Khakas. The total level of genetic differentiation of the pool consisting of 17 populations turned out to be relatively high ( F st = 0.0267, or 2.67%) and highly significant ( p > 0.00001).
This effect size is also highly significant at a level of 0.01 ( P < 0.00001).
Gender exhibited a highly significant association (X2 = 45.9, p < 0.00001), highlighting differences in awareness levels between males and females; women are more knowledgeable than men.