Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP = 1.29E-060.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When combining samples carrying the four co-susceptibility alleles A29, A30, A31, and A33, we found a highly significant enrichment in BSCR cases when compared with the larger control cohorts (GHS cohort 1, P = 1.29E-06; GHS cohort 2, P = 1.07E-06; UKB, P = 9.62E-07) ( Table 1 , top row).
highly significantp = 1.3 × 10 −60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Within the Detected group, the difference between global methylation levels in PLWH and SN was highly significant at Visit 2 (post-HAART, p = 1.3 × 10 −6 ; Welch’s t -test comparing mean CpG values in each PLWH group to their matched SN controls), while within the Undetected group, the mean difference in global methylation between PLWH and SN and the significance ( p = 0.015) were diminished. 3.3 GREAT functio
highly significantp = 1.3 × 10 −60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
At the end of the study (165 days), after three dosing cycles of E5, we observed highly significant improvements in TNF-alpha levels (Student’s T test p = 1.3 × 10 −6 for males and p = 7.6 × 10 −5 for females) and IL-6 levels ( p = 4.1 × 10 −6 for males, p = 3.4 × 10 −6 for females, Supplementary Fig. 14 A–D) in the blood of E5-injected rats over that of saline controls.
highly significantP<1.3×10 −60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
SNP associations were genome-wide significant with CC-BNT (P<2.4×10 −7 ) and CC-WRAT (P<1.0×10 −8 ), nearly genome wide significant with CC-LMI (P<6.0×10 −7 ), and highly significant with CC-LMD (P<1.3×10 −6 ), CC-HVOT (P<1.9×10 −6 ) and CC-TMTB (P<3.7×10 −6 ).
highly significantp < 1.39 × 10 − 60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Overall paired comparisons across the five irradiation scenarios demonstrated highly significant differences for both the mean blood dose and the mean circulating lymphocyte dose (Friedman test: χ 2 = 646.4 , p < 1.39 × 10 − 6 and χ 2 = 638.8 , p < 6.30 × 10 − 6 , respectively) (Data Supplement).
highly significantP = 1.4 × 10 -60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Using Table 6 of that publication, it is possible to calculate the association of lupus anticoagulant (LA) with FVL both in women with recurrent pregnancy loss and in controls, and this association was highly significant for both groups (χ 2 test, P = 1.4 × 10 -6 , for the combined groups: 26 LA-positive women out of 43 women with FVL, compared with 46 LA-positive women out of 209 controls).