Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 8.2 x 10 −80.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There were highly significant differences in the levels of Ty mobility among strains encoding heterospecific NUP84 (one-way ANOVA, p = 8.2 x 10 −8 ), and levels of Ty1 mobility were significantly different in strains containing NUP84 S . mik , NUP84 S . kud , and NUP84 S . bay when compared to NUP84 S . cer (Tukey–Kramer method, p<0.05) ( Fig 5A ).
highly significantp = 8.5×10 −80.0× alphaqualifiedgold
At an FDR threshold of 0.01, all of the solutions were highly significant ( p = 8.5×10 −8 for NGT-EMRN, 7.4×10 −9 for NGT-CMRN, p = 7.0×10 −15 for IGT-EMRN, p = 0.025 for IGT-CMRN, respectively, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test) indicating that the clustering of metabolite changes in the network is highly non-random.
borderline significantP=8.52×10 -80.0× alphagold
CD, MOSGWA selected 14 SNPs, including rs17659990 (P=5.43×10 -9 , DOCK3 ) that reached the generally accepted level of genome-wide significance, followed by borderline significant rs7742915 (P=8.52×10 -8 , BTBD9 ), rs16944613 (P=1.49×10 -7 , CRTC3 ), rs13129679 (P=2.38×10 -7 , RNF4 ) and rs12953717 (P=3.00×10 -7 , SMAD7 ), a well-known CRC susceptibility variant.
nearly significantP = 9.0 × 10 −80.0× alphagold
For example, there were significant associations between PTVs in PSAP and increased progranulin ( GRN ; P = 5.5 × 10 −17 ; β = 2.60; 95% CI, 1.99 to 3.21) and cathepsin B ( P = 1.2 × 10 −11 ; β = 2.10; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.70), and a nearly significant association with increased cathepsin D ( P = 9.0 × 10 −8 ; β = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.20) (Supplementary Table 8 ).
highly significantp = 9.4x10 -80.0× alphaqualifiedgold
3.1 Apoptosis in CD8 + T lymphocytes correlates with systemic iron levels In general, a highly significant difference was found between the CD4 + and CD8 + T-lymphocyte subpopulations in terms of the percentages of apoptotic cells (T Test p = 9.4x10 -8 , KS-Test p = 0.000002), with the average apoptosis percentage being 21.8% ±9.9% in CD4 + T cells, and 47.3% ±21.8% in CD8 + T cells.
nominally significantP = 9.5 × 10 −80.0× alphagold
Consistently, we found nominally significant associations with risks of both, myeloid (log(OR) = 1.52, P = 9.5 × 10 −8 ) and lymphoid (log(OR) = 1.38, P = 3.1 × 10 −7 ) leukaemia, but also multiple myeloma (log(OR) = 1.07, P = 5.1 × 10 −5 ) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (log(OR) = 0.81, P = 4.7 × 10 −4 ).