Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP <10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis carried out on the timing errors, pooled over all subjects after averaging over all repetitions of each condition (four-way ANOVA, 3 [viewing distance] x 5 [ball descent duration] x 2 [figure type] x 6 [character type]), showed highly significant effects of character type ( F 5,1168 = 113.188, P <10 −7 ) and figure type ( static versus dynamic , F 1,1168 = 25.180, P <10 −6 ), less significant effects of viewing distance ( F 2,1168 = 3.602, P <0.05) and of the interaction between character type and figure type ( F 5,1168 = 2.569, P <0.05).
highly significantp<.00000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A 2-way ANOVA on proportion of correct recalls revealed no main effect of group (F(1,34) = 3.51, p = .065, r = .25), but a highly significant effect of type of Encoding (F(1,34) = 44.45, p<.0000001, r = .75), and a significant interaction between Group and type of Encoding (F(1,34) = 9.14, p<.005, r = .46).
highly significantp < 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Autophagy genes, including DAPK3 and ULK1, which were previously shown to be DAXX repression targets [Submitted], were found to be closer to DAXX ChIP-Seq peaks than all other genes combined (Figure 3 ), implying that they are very likely to be regulated by DAXX (with the difference being highly significant: p < 10 −7 ).
highly significantP=0. 00000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found very strong evidence of association of multiple SNPs at TTC12 and ANKK1 in two different populations, EAs and AAs (minimal P=0.0007 in AAs and minimal P=0.00009 in EAs), and highly significant association of a single haplotype (set of markers) spanning TTC12 and ANKK1 to ND in the pooled sample (P=0. 0000001).
Genetics of drug dependence.
Dialogues Clin Neurosci · 2010 · PMC3181942
highly significantp < 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The test showed highly significant correlations for all four locations (C6‐r: tau = 0.52, p < 10 −7 ; C6‐l: tau = 0.52, p < 10 −7 ; C5‐r: tau = 0.53, p < 10 −7 ; C5‐l: tau = 0.50, p < 10 −6 ), confirming a statistically significant increase in the diameter with age for all four locations.
highly significantp < 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These changes could reflect changes in the training of those who name species, as more species are named by scientists who are not classically trained taxonomists or who have less familiarity with Latin and Greek; however, these hypotheses would be difficult to test. A notable feature of the etymological patterns in table 2 is that they vary among the surveyed taxa (and this variation is highly significant: p < 10 −7 ).
highly significantp < 10 –70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The difference of this value with the plateau of neutralizing activity of hospitalized individuals was highly significant (p < 10 –7 by Z-test, and p < 10 –4 by Wilcoxon test as described in methods; Fig. 2 B), and reflects the different distribution (p = 0.0003, Chi-square test) of individuals with undetectable (< 20), low (20–100), medium (100–1000) or high (> 1000) neutralization titers in the non-hospitalized and the hospitalized groups (Fig. 2 C).
nominally significantp < 1.0 × 10 − 70.0× alphagold
Polygenic risk score (PRS) computation SNPs of PRS include: 1) SNPs that are statistically significant or nominally significant per GWAS threshold ( p < 1.0 × 10 − 7 and p < 1.0 × 10 − 6 , respectively) and exome sequencing analysis ( p < 9.2 × 10 − 7 and p < 9.2 × 10 − 6 , respectively) [ 14 ]; 2) Index SNPs or Proxy SNPs in 1 Mb region that were statistically significantly and nominally significantly associated with bone health ( p < p value threshold and p < 0.05, respectively).