Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 10 −90.0× alphaqualifiedgold
De novo MEME analysis (Figure S2A ) reveals that Round 25 aptamers overwhelmingly share a single, contiguous motif that extends across nearly the entire 40‐nt core, with RTAR and its closest relatives showing highly significant full‐length matches ( p < 10 −9 ), whereas the less enriched clusters display only truncated or offset hits to secondary motifs.
highly significantp = 1.04e-090.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The higher the percentages of explanation of variation the better the variables in the models explain the redox parameters. The linear regression model for TAOS accounted for 24.9% of the variation. According to our analyses, highly significant predictors for TAOS were creatinine ( p = 1.04e-09), TG ( p = 1.05e-06), and PH ( p = 0.0006).
highly significantP < 1.04 × 10 –90.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We then compared this pulmonary endothelial cell PAH network with the previously described human PAH disease module inclusive of 357 genes ( 19 , 23 , 24 ) and found a highly significant overlap between these 2 networks ( P < 1.04 × 10 –9 ) ( Supplemental Figure 3D ) as well as between the pulmonary endothelial in inflammatory PAH with other inflammatory (positive control) diseases in the human interactome ( Supplemental Table 2 ).
highly significantp = 1.2 × 10 −90.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, surgical intervention occurred earlier in patients without osteolysis compared to patients with osteolysis (median 11.5 months compared to 72 months when duration since the primary prosthetic joint replacement was considered, and 2.5 versus 36 months since the last surgical intervention; the differences are highly significant with p = 1.2 × 10 −9 and p = 1.6 × 10 −13 , respectively).
highly significantp < 1.3e-090.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This means we found a 7.5-fold under-representation of CTCF sites in the differentially methylated loci (0.2% in differentially methylated fragments vs 1.5% in all fragments), which was highly significant ( p < 1.3e-09 by Proportional Test).
highly significantp = 1.32E-090.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When analysed within the largest of our cohorts (YFS) the minor allelic effect size of rs113288603 increased from non-significant ( beta = 0.05, p = 0.522) to highly significant ( beta = -0.47, p = 1.32E-09) when rs56113850 was added to the model; when an interaction term (rs56113850*rs113288603) was also added to the model the effect size further increased ( beta = -0.62, p = 1.32E-03).
highly significantp = 1.35x10 -90.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant difference in the percentage of cells classed as place cells by the different methods (p = 1.35x10 -9 , linear mixed-effects model with method as a fixed-effect and mouse ID, with session number nested, as a random effect), with the Information method detecting the highest number (47.0 +/- 12.2% (mean +/- std)), followed by the Peak method (34.5 +/- 11.1%) and the Stability method (16.5+/- 8.8%), while the Combination method only classified 3.9 +/- 1.9% of cells as place cells.