Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 5.9 e − 100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
PBB exposure was highly significant in the EPM regression model ( p = 5.9 e − 10) but not the penalized regression model ( p = 0.141). 3 Discussion Epigenetic clocks are widely used biomarkers that can accurately predict the age of an individual based on their methylation pattern.
highly significantP = 5.97E-100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant GO terms associated to biological processes were identified, including: homophilic cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules (P = 5.97E-10, false discovery rate, FDR, 3.93E-6); cell-cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules (P = 6.31E-8, FDR 2.08E-4); nervous system development (P = 8.82E-6, FDR 1.93E-2); cell-cell adhesion (P = 1.66E-5, FDR 2.74E-2); biological adhesion (P = 2.89E-5, FDR 3.8E-2).
highly significantP = 6E-0100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Paired t-test of quantitative scoring of sputum bacillary load at baseline and post-treatment revealed that the decrease in V5 group was highly significant (from mean/median 2.2 ± 0.98/3 to 0.29 ± 0.55/0; P = 6E-010) but no difference was seen in placebo recipients (1.9 ± 0.99/1.5 to 1.8 ± 1.03/1; P = 0.34).
highly significantp=6.01 × 10 -100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, after PTPN22 the second most significant association is observed on chromosome 2 in the region of REL , where two markers provide highly significant evidence of association (rs13031237, allele specific p=6.01 × 10 -10 and rs13017599, allele specific p=9.05 × 10 -9 ), as shown in Table 1 .
highly significantp = 6.02 × 10 −100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The 19 F NMR dataset acquired was then analysed using a completely randomised design (one-way) type 1 analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) model, and this demonstrated that although there were no significant “between-participant” differences in δ values found (range of mean values −119.41 to −119.33 ppm only, p = 0.071), that between Δv 1/2 was very highly significant indeed, with p = 6.02 × 10 −10 .
nominally significantp = 6.04 × 10 − 100.0× alphagold
With respect to loci identified by GWI candidate gene studies [ 50 – 52 ] and the previous GWI genome-wide association study (GWAS) (Table S7) [ 16 ], we observed nominally significant interaction with exposure to biological/chemical or warfare agents for GWAS-identified locus rs142258944*C (G×E beta = 0.625, joint- p = 6.04 × 10 − 10 , interaction- p = 0.005) and candidate locus PON1 rs662*C (G×E beta = 0.345, joint- p = 0.036, interaction- p = 0.012).
highly significantp = 6.6e –100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Only a small number of patients were identified to carry CREBBP mutations, therefore to more holistically link CREBBP-activity to ferroptotic susceptibility, we correlated gene sets involved in ferroptosis with CREBBP expression, demonstrating a highly significant negative correlation ( R = –0.42, p = 6.6e –10 ) (Supplementary Data Table 4 , Fig. 5f ).
almost significantP = 6.66 E-100.0× alphagold
Moreover, patients with genotype TC were likely to have higher age-at-onset migraine than patients with the wild type. Associations in the subgroups with aura In all migraine cohorts with aura, 3 SNPs had P < 5 E-08 (rs77630941 in CUX1 , rs146778855 in CDH18 , and rs117608715 in NOL3 ) and 1 SNP (rs150592309 in PRAP1 ) were almost significant in the aura groups ( P = 6.66 E-10, P = 1.21 E-08, P = 1.78 E-08, P = 8.88 E-08, respectively in Fig. 4 A–D).
highly significantP = 6.7E-100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
S1 D ), a highly significant incidence ( P = 6.7E-10) compared to the expected frequency of pathogenic BLM mutations in the general population of 1 in 900 ( 25 ), and as high as the 1-in-100 incidence among people of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, who carry a specific set of mutations ( 29 ) that were not found in any of our patients, as none of them were of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry.
nominally significantP = 6.87 × 10 −100.0× alphagold
Although the observed sign concordance of 52% is not significantly different from a random pattern ( P = 0.40), we find 3.23 times more SNPs in this set of 506 SNPs that are nominally significant for SZ than expected given the distribution of the P values in the SZ GWAS results (raw enrichment P = 6.87 × 10 −10 ).